L&W Innovations, LLC v. Linli Construction, Inc. et al
| L&W Innovations, LLC |
| Linli Construction, Inc., John Yelenick, Gas-O-Haul, Inc. and Bradley J. Light |
| 1:2007cv00563 |
| March 21, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Douglas |
| Edward W. Nottingham |
| Michael J. Watanabe |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
213
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: All claims, counterclaims, third party claims, and this civil action are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with each party to pay his or its own costs and attorney fees, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 08/19/09.(wjc, )
|
|
Filing
211
ORDER granting 209 Motion to Vacate 08/24/2009 Trial Date. The jury charge hearing set 08/14/2009 at 1:30 p.m. is VACATED. The jury trial set to commence on 08/24/2009 at 8:30 a.m. is hereby VACATED. Dismissal Paper due by 8/21/2009, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 08/12/09.(wjc, )
|
|
Filing
208
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 154 Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Memorandum Brief. L&Ws Fourth Claim for Relief in the 36 Amended Complaint for violation of Colo. Rev. Stat § 6-1- 105, the Colorado Consumer Protection Act, was dismissed as to all Defendants at the hearing held on 06/04/2009. L&Ws Fifth Claim for Relief for common law civil conspiracy was dismissed as to Defendants Linli and Yelenick at the hearing held on 06/ 04/2009. L&Ws Seventh Claim for Relief for unjust enrichment may proceed to trial. Plaintiff L&W Innovations, LLCs 194 Motion to Modify Scheduling Order and Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, or, in the Alternative, Motion in Limine is DENIED, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 08/05/09.(wjc, )
|
|
Filing
207
COURTROOM MINUTES - Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer: Trial Preparation Conference held on 7/24/2009. ORDERED: Plaintiff's Motion to Maintain Attorneys' Eyes Only Designation as to Non-Exhibit Docum ents (doc # 199 , filed 6/30/2009) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The parties will proceed under the guidelines as stated on the record. ORDERED: The parties may file trial briefs no later than August 18, 2009. ORDERED: A Preliminary Charg e Conference is set for August 14, 2009 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer to discuss jury instructions. ORDERED: The parties may submit proposed voir dire questions no later than August 18, 2009. ORDERED: The parties shall contact chambers' staff by the close of business today advising the court of how many days will be needed for the trial. (Court Reporter FTR - Linda Kahoe) (cbscd)
|
|
Filing
197
AMENDED COURTROOM MINUTES - Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer. Courtroom Minutes 191 amended to add Post Recess Order: Motion in Limine 153 is GRANTED IN PART. (cbscd)
|
|
Filing
186
ORDER granting 181 Plaintiff's Motion for Voluntary Dismissal of Claims Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(2). Plaintiffs claim for Misappropriation of Business Values ( 36 Sixth Claim for Relief in the Amended Complaint is dismissed. Plaintiff s claims for Federal Trademark Infringement ( 36 Second Claim for Relief in Amended Complaint), Common Law Trademark Infringement ( 36 Third Claim for Relief in Amended Complaint), and Civil Conspiracy ( 36 Fifth Claim for Relief in Amended Complaint) are dismissed as to Defendants Gas-OHaul, Inc. and Bradley J. Light only, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 05/26/09.(wjc, )
|
|
Filing
179
ORDER granting 178 Third Party Plaintiffs' Motion for Voluntary Dimissal of Claims Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(A)(2). Defendant Yelenicks 92 Counterclaims against Plaintiff L&W for Breach of Contract, Quantum Meruit, and Unjust Enrichmen t are dismissed without prejudice. Defendant LINLIs 90 Counterclaim and Third Party claim against L&W, Lips, Warnimont, and Clukies for Federal Trademark Infringement is dismissed without prejudice. Defendant LINLIs 90 Third Party claims agains t Clukies for Common Law Trademark, Misappropriation of Business Values, Unjust Enrichment, and Demand for Accounting are dismissed without prejudice as to Third-Party Defendant Clukies only. Defendant Gas-O-Hauls 89 claim against Clukies for Unjust Enrichment is dismissed without prejudice as to Third-Party Defendant Clukies only, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 05/07/09.(wjc, )
|
|
Filing
175
ORDER to Prepare Jury Instructions: Stipulated proposed jury instructions and form(s) of verdict on or before 05/29/09, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 05/04/09. (wjc, )
|
|
Filing
157
MINUTE ORDER granting 156 Unopposed Motion to Extend Deadline to Respond to 154 Defendants' Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and 153 Motion in Limine Regarding Damages to 04/14/09, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 04/13/09.(wjc, ) Modified on 4/14/2009 to add linkage to motion granted and edit text for clarification (wjc, ).
|
|
Filing
142
Memorandum Opinion and ORDER denying 115 Third-Party Defendant Paul Clukies' "Motion to Reconsider Denial of Paul Clukies' Motion to Dismiss Third-Party Complaints Filed Against Him, and Motion to Dismiss Based on Fed.R.Civ.P.13(b)." Signed by Magistrate Judge Craig B Shaffer on 01/27/09.(wjc, )
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER Scheduling Conference set for 5/4/2007 08:30 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 3/30/07. (pap, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
