Hill v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
| Philip Hill |
| Christine Miller, Correctional Corporation of America, Joe Ortiz, Joe (I) Ortiz, Stephen Schoenmakers, Christine (I) Miller and Stephen (I) Schoenmakers |
| 1:2007cv00571 |
| March 22, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Crowley |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
144
ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant Corrections Corporation of America 108 is Granted and judgment on the Second Amended Complaint is entered in favor of Defendants Corrections Corporation of America and "Executive Director of CCA" with each party to pay his or its own attorney fees and costs. Ordered that the above action is dismissed by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 08/11/09.(jjh, )
|
|
Filing
139
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Defendant Corrections Corporation of Americas (CCAs) Motion for Summary Judgment (filed February 20, 2009) 108 be GRANTED and judgment on the Second Amended Complaint 13 be entered in favor of Defendants CCA and Executive Director of CCA, with each party to pay his or its own costs, and attorney fees. By Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 07/02/2009. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
136
COURTROOM MINUTES - Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer. Motion Hearing held on 6/11/2009. ORDERED: Plaintiff's Motion, Requesting a Delay, or Continuance 133 is DENIED. ORDERED: Plaintiff shall file a Response to the Motion for Summary Judgment 108 on or before JUNE 30, 2009. (Court Reporter FTR - Linda Kahoe) (cbscd)
|
|
Filing
122
ORDER denying as moot 121 Plaintiffs Request for Production of Document No. (108), Motion for Summary Judgment. Mr. Hill shall file his response to Defendant Corrections Corporation of Americas Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. # 108) on or before 04/30/2009. Defendants may file any reply to their Motion for Summary Judgment on or before 05/18/2009 by Magistrate Judge Craig B Shaffer on 03/17/2009.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
119
ORDER granting 117 Plaintiffs Request for Production of Document No. 108 , Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant Corrections Corporation of America is directed to, on or before 03/20/2009, re-mail to Mr. Hill a copy of its Motion for Summary Judg ment (doc. # 108) and the attached Exhibits A-1 through A-14 (docs. # 108-2 through 108-15). Mr. Hill shall file his response to Defendant Corrections Corporation of Americas Motion for Summary Judgment on or before 04/30/2009 by Magistrate Judge Craig B Shaffer on 03/13/2009.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
113
ORDER denying without prejudice 110 Mr. Hill's Request to Amend Prisoner Complaint by Magistrate Judge Craig B Shaffer on 02/24/2009.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER Directing Clerk to Commence Civil Action and Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiency. Plaintiff has 30 days to file a certified copy of prisoner's trust fund statement covering the entire 6-month period preceding this filing. Plaintiff ha s 30 days to file a Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 on the court's current and proper form. Plaintiff has 30 days to file a Prisoner Complaint on the court's current and proper form. Signed by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 3/21/2007. (llr, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
