Gonzales v. State of Colorado et al
| Consuelo Gonzales |
| Colorado State Veterans Center, Colorado, State of and Department of Human Services |
| 1:2007cv00653 |
| April 2, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Rio Grande |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Wiley Y. Daniel |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
60
AMENDED ORDER OF DISMISSAL re: 58 Order on Motion to Dismiss. Upon consideration of the parties Stipulated Motion for Dismissal 59 , filedAugust 12, 2009, it is ORDERED that the Stipulated Motion for Dismissal is APPROVED and this case is now DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE , each party to pay their own costs and attorneys fees. by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 8/12/09. (erv, )
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER granting 57 Motion to Dismiss WITHOUT PREJUDICE, each party to pay their own costs and attorneys fees. by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 6/9/09.(erv, )
|
|
Filing
51
MINUTE ORDER In light of the Minute Entry entered March 11, 2009, indicating that this case has settled, the parties Motions in Limine 40 , and 41 are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 3/11/09.(erv, )
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER, Set Hearings: Scheduling Conference set for 6/1/2007 10:30 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland. Signed by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 7/14/07. (erv, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
