Trujillo et al v. Colorado Springs, City of et al
Plaintiff: Gilbert Lucero, Alexander L. Trujillo, David Henrichsen, Alan Roman and Colby Doolittle
Defendant: Colorado Springs, City of
Case Number: 1:2007cv00753
Filed: April 13, 2007
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: El Paso
Presiding Judge: Boyd N. Boland
Presiding Judge: Marcia S. Krieger
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 127 ORDER Approving Second Amended Third Application for Supplemental Costs Incurred After Entry of Judgment. Class Counsel's 126 Second Amended Motion for Approval of Supplemental Costs Incurred after Entry of Judgment is GRANTED. Supplemental c osts from 10/12/2009 through 12/08/2010 plus final expenses of Class Administration through the conclusion of the distribution of the Class Settlement, in the amended amount of $8,993.27 are approved and awarded to Class Counsel, and shall be paid by Defendant according to the terms of the Settlement Agreement, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 12/30/2010.(wjc, )
December 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 122 ORDER Approving Third Application for Supplemental Costs Incurred After Entry of Judgment. The 121 Class Counsel's Third Unopposed Motion for Approval of Supplemental Costs Incurred after Entry of Judgment is GRANTED. Supplemental costs from 1 0/12/2009 through 12/8/2010, plus final expenses of Class Administration through the conclusion of the distribution of the Class Settlement, in the amount of $12,993.27 are approved and awarded to Class Counsel, and shall be paid by Defendant according to the terms of the Settlement Agreement, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 12/15/10.(mnf, )
November 2, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 112 ORDER APPROVING SECOND APPLICATION FOR SUPPLEMENTAL COSTS INCURRED AFTER ENTRY OF JUDGMENT: The 111 Motion for Costs is GRANTED. Supplemental costs from December 5, 2008, to October 12, 2009, plus estimated expenses of Class Administration through January 16, 2010, in the amount of $8,636.34 are approved and awarded to class counsel, and shall be paid by Defendant according to the terms of the Settlement Agreement. Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 11/2/09.(msksec, )
June 11, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 110 ORDER GRANTING 109 MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF SUPPLEMENTAL COSTS. Pursuant to the Plaintiffs 109 Unopposed Motion for Approval of Supplemental Costs. There being no opposition, the motion is GRANTED. Additional costs in the amount of $ 20,801.40 are awarded against the Defendant, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 06/11/09.(wjc, )
April 26, 2007 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER setting Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference and Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting set for 6/22/2007 08:30 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland. Signed by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/26/07. (dln, )
April 18, 2007 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER Regarding Custody of Exhibits and Depositions. Within 30 days after judgment is entered, counsel for the parties shall obtain from the Court any exhibits and depositions used during this case. Counsel shall retain same for 60 days beyond the la ter of the time to appeal or conclusion of all appellate proceedings. Failure to retrieve the exhibits and depositions in this matter in conformance with this Order may result in their destruction. Signed by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 4/18/07. (gms, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Trujillo et al v. Colorado Springs, City of et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gilbert Lucero
Represented By: Paul W. Hurcomb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alexander L. Trujillo
Represented By: Paul W. Hurcomb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Henrichsen
Represented By: Scott William Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alan Roman
Represented By: Scott William Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Colby Doolittle
Represented By: Scott William Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Colorado Springs, City of
Represented By: Steven Woodrow Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?