Newman v. Ed Bozarth Chevrolet Company, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Andrew B. Newman
Defendant: Ed Bozarth Chevrolet Company, Inc. and Ed Bozarth Chevrolet Pontiac & Buick, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2007cv00969
Filed: May 10, 2007
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: John L. Kane
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 3, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 155 ORDER accepting 150 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff's First Claim for Relief alleging a violation of the federal Truth in Lending Act is dismissed with prejudice and that defendant Ed Bozarth Chevrolet C ompany, Inc. is granted leave to seek an award of its attorney's fees in relation to this claim. Granting 84 Defendant Ed Bozarth Chevrolet Company, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment, and the case is dismissed with prejudice in its enti rety. Judgment shall enter in favor of defendant Ed Bozarth Chevrolet Company, Inc. and against plaintiff Andrew Newman on plaintiffs Second, Third, and Fourth claims for relief. Defendant Ed Bozarth Chevrolet Company, Inc. may have its costs by filing a bill of costs within fourteen days of the date of this order. Denying as moot 104 Plaintiff's Motion for Class Certification. Denying as moot 107 Amended Motion for Class Certification, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 3/3/10.(ebs, )
February 6, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 154 ORDER deferring ruling on 104 Plaintiff's Motion Class Certification; deferring ruling on 107 Amended Motion to Certify Class pending final order concerning Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, by Magistrate Judge Gudrun J. Rice on 02/06/09.(wjc, )
January 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 150 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Plaintiff's First Claim for Relief alleging a violation of the federal Truth in Lending Act be dismissed with prejudice and that Bozarth be granted leave to seek an award of its attorney's fees; 2) Summary judgmen t should enter in favor of Bozarth on Plaintiff's Second, Third and Fourth Claims for Relief; 3) As the prevailing party, Bozarth should be granted leave to seek an award of its costs pursuant to Rule 54 (d), Fed. R. Civ. P. re: 84 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Gudrun J. Rice on 1/5/09. (erv, ) Modified on 10/2/2009 to create linkage (gms, ).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Newman v. Ed Bozarth Chevrolet Company, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andrew B. Newman
Represented By: Peter A. Ricciardelli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ed Bozarth Chevrolet Company, Inc.
Represented By: Christopher C. Zenisek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ed Bozarth Chevrolet Pontiac & Buick, Inc.
Represented By: Christopher C. Zenisek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?