Tinley v. Poly-Triplex Technologies, Inc. et al
Mathew Tinley |
Poly-Triplex Technologies, Inc. and W. Chris Blane |
1:2007cv01136 |
May 30, 2007 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Arapahoe |
Wiley Y. Daniel |
Craig B Shaffer |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 203 ORDER. Ordered that Defendants' Poly-Triplex Technologies, Inc. and W. Chris Blane's Motion for Attorneys Fees and Expenses 182 is DENIED by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 02/23/11.(jjh, ) |
Filing 171 ORDER THIS MATTER comes before the Court for resolution of Plaintiffs equitable claim for promissory estoppel following a jury trial on Plaintiffs breach of contract claim and Defendants counterclaims for breach of an implied contract for money had a nd received. I find that Plaintiff has not proven his promissory estoppel claim, and I decline to award any relief in connection with this claim. In accordance therewith, it is hereby ORDERED that Judgment shall enter in favor of Defendants on Plaintiffs claim for promissory estoppel. by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 6/19/2010. (erv, ) |
Filing 170 ORDER RETURNING EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 4/15/10. (wydcd, rrk) |
Filing 146 Minute Entry for Trial Preparation Conference on 3/22/10 held before Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel: Granting in part, denying in part, and deferring ruling in part as outlined by the Court on 105 Motion in Limine. (Court Reporter Therese Lindblom) (wydcd, rrk) |
Filing 110 MINUTE ORDER granting 106 Motion for Leave to File Proposed Jury Instructions and Motion in Limine Out of Time to and including Friday, March 5, 2010. Entered by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 3/5/10. (wydcd, rrk) |
Filing 93 ORDER re: 92 Notice of Scheduling Conflict filed by W. Chris Blane, Poly- Triplex Technologies, Inc. This case was filed in 2007 and I will not reset the scheduled trial sua sponte. If counsel for Defendants wishes to reschedule the trial in this case he will need to confer with opposing counsel and file an appropriate motion. Upon receipt of such motion, I will schedule a hearing and require all counsel to personally be present. by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 12/11/09. (erv, ) |
Filing 89 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 55 Defendants Revised Motion for Summary Judgment. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs Third Claim for Relief for Interference with Contract against Defendant Blane, and DENIED in all other respects, including Defendants request for summary judgment as to their counterclaims. by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 3/26/09.(erv, ) |
Filing 11 ORDER setting Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference and Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting set for 8/1/2007 09:00 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Craig B Shaffer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Craig B Shaffer on 6/11/07. (dln, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.