Beidleman v. Holt, Rinehart and Winston et al
Plaintiff: Neal Beidleman
Defendant: Holt, Rinehart and Winston and R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company
Case Number: 1:2007cv01220
Filed: June 11, 2007
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Pitkin
Presiding Judge: Zita L. Weinshienk
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 184 ORDER. The order dismissing this case 182 is amended and that this case case is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41 (a). By Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 11/23/2009. (sah, )
November 4, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 182 ORDER. This action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R.Civ. P. 41(a), the parties to pay their own costs and attorneys fees. The trial previously set in this case for 11/02/2009, is vacated. By Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 11/04/2009. (sah, )
April 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 176 Minute ORDER granting 173 Parties' Joint Motion re: Motions in Limine. Motions in Limine to be filed on or before 9/16/09, by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 4/23/09.(gms, )
April 22, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 177 ORDER Court has considered the 173 Joint MOTION re: Motions In Limine. All pretrial motions in limine to be filed by 9/16/09 and responses filed no later than 9/30/09, by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 4/22/09. (gms, )
April 21, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 175 ORDER granting 172 Revised Joint Motion to Amend Pretrial Order by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 4/21/09.(erv, )
April 3, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 169 ORDER Status Report due by 9/23/2009. Five Day Jury Trial set for 11/2/2009 10:30 AM in Courtroom A 801 before Judge Zita L. Weinshienk. Trial Preparation Conference set for 10/7/2009 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom A 801 before Judge Zita L. Weinshienk. It is FURTHER ORDERED that all motions in limine shall be filed on or before Wednesday, September 23, 2009, responses (if necessary) to be filed no later than Wednesday, (Modified on 4/7/2009 edited typing error)(erv, ).
February 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 160 ORDER granting 158 Plaintiffs' Motion to Reconsider Order Denying Actual Damages. The phrase an award of actual damage in this case is not available under the Copyright Act is stricken from the Courts January 7, 2009 157 Order, by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 2/5/09.(gmssl, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Beidleman v. Holt, Rinehart and Winston et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Neal Beidleman
Represented By: Christopher Seidman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Holt, Rinehart and Winston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?