Asher Associates, LLC et al v. Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc.
Asher Associates, LLC and Petra Energy, Inc. |
Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc. |
Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc. |
Asher Associates, LLC |
1:2007cv01379 |
June 29, 2007 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Arapahoe |
Wiley Y. Daniel |
Craig B Shaffer |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 264 ORDER For Dismissal With Prejudice of All Claims and Counterclaims. All claims asserted by Plaintiffs Asher Associates, LLC and Petra Energy, Inc. and the counterclaim asserted by Defendant Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc. d/b/a Centrilift are dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs and attorney fees. By Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 12/15/2009. (sah, ) |
Filing 237 MEMORANDUM OPINION. In light of the foregoing analysis: (1) lost revenues/profits likely is an inappropriate measure of damages; and (2) the loss of return on lost oil revenues or on monies spent as a result of any defective pump, are not recoverable. Notwithstanding the foregoing analysis, because any definitive ruling on these issues would be premature at this time, the Court RESERVES decision. By Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 11/18/2009. (sah, ) |
Filing 185 COURTROOM MINUTES - Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer: Motion Hearing held on 6/30/2009. ORDERED: Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Seal 176 is GRANTED. Exhibits A, D, F, I, N, Q, R and S shall remain se aled. ORDERED: Defendant's Motion to Amend Scheduling Order 179 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Discovery is reopened to allow Baker Hughes to take a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of a Weatherford corporate representative; and to allow Bake r Hughes to reopen the depositions of Mr. Bayne and Mr. Patton regarding all communication and dealings with Weatherford at Well 44-5, as well as production obtained at Well 44-5 as a result of Weatherford's work. Discovery shall be completed on or before 9/15/2009. (Court Reporter Linda Kahoe) (cbscd) |
Filing 175 ORDER denying 70 Defendants Motion for Partial Summary Judgment to Prohibit Plaintiffs Claims for Certain Categories of Damages; denying 71 Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendants Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 5/20/09.(erv, ) |
Filing 171 MEMORANDUM ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part 64 Plaintiffs' Motion for Sanctions for the Defendants Spoliation of Evidence. by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 5/12/09.(erv, ) |
Filing 169 MINUTE ORDER dismissing without prejudice 104 , 105 , 106 , 110 , 115 Motions in Limine as premature with leave to refile no sooner than ninety (90) days before the Final Trial Preparation Conference and no later than (45) forty-five days before the Final Trial Preparation Conference. by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 4/28/09.TEXT ONLY ENTRY - NO DOCUMENT ATTACHED (erv, ) |
Filing 131 MINUTE ORDER granting 128 Motion to Withdraw 57 Notice of Entry of Appearance ; granting 128 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Scott Thomas Varholak terminated, by Magistrate Judge Craig B Shaffer on 1/20/09.(erv, ) |
Filing 6 ORDER, Set Hearings: Scheduling Conference set for 8/22/2007 10:45 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Craig B Shaffer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Craig B Shaffer on 7/11/07. (erv, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.