Ortega et al v. Saenz et al
| Edgar Pena Ortega, Anastacio Valdez, Rose Medina, Guillermo Orozco and Ismael Romano Rivera |
| Francisco Saenz, Hulteen Orchards, Inc. and Mountain Fresh, L.L.C. |
| 1:2007cv01408 |
| July 5, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Marcia S. Krieger |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
ORDER Granting 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; Granting 5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; Granting 6 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; Granting 7 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; Gran ting 8 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis Granting 4 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend/Correct/Modify 2 Order, To the extend the July 5, 2007, order directedPlaintiffs to cure deficiencies in their 28 U.S.C. § 1915 motions, the order is vacated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 7/10/07.(pap, )
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER Directing Clerk to Commence Civil Action and Directng Plaintiffs to Cure Deficiency. Plaintiff Ortega has 30 days to file a notarized Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. The remaining Plaintiffs have to days to each file a separate Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. Signed by Magistrate Judge Craig B Shaffer on 7/3/2007. (llr, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
