Foutz v. Sterling Construction Management, LLC et al
| Craig D. Foutz |
| Sterling Construction Management, LLC and Sterling Construction Company |
| 1:2007cv01524 |
| July 19, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Las Animas |
| Robert E. Blackburn |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
ORDER. Defendants Joint Motions and Brief for Summary Judgment 40 , filed 07/25/2008, is GRANTED. The plaintiffs ADA claim and the plaintiffs civil conspiracy claim are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Judgment SHALL ENTER for the defendants, Sterling Con struction Management, LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company, and Sterling Construction Company, a Colorado corporation, and against the plaintiff, Craig D. Foutz. The Trial Preparation Conference set for Thursday, 01/15/2009, is VACATED. The trial, which is currently scheduled to commence Tuesday, 01/20/2009, is VACATED. Defendants are AWARDED their costs. All other pending motions, including 59 , 61 , and 62 , are DENIED asmoot. Signed by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 01/12/2009.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER, Set Hearings: Scheduling Conference set for 10/10/2007 09:00 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland. Signed by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 8/8/07. (erv, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
