Birdsall v. Roanoke Companies Group, Inc. et al
| Jacqueline Birdsall |
| SLR, Inc., Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., Aerofil Technology, Inc., Innovative Chemical Technologies, Inc. and Ortec, Inc. |
| Ortec, Inc. and SLR, Inc. |
| Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., Ortec, Inc., Aerofil Technology, Inc and Innovative Chemical Technologies, Inc. |
| 1:2007cv01738 |
| August 17, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Arapahoe |
| Wiley Y. Daniel |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
131
ORDER of Dismissal With Prejudice 129 . Each party to bear its own attorney's fees and costs by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 08/18/11. (jjh, )
|
|
Filing
127
ORDER of Dismissal With Prejudice. ORDERED that the Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice of Plaintiff Jacqueline Birdsall and Defendants Roanoke Companies Group, Inc., n/k/a BRTT, Inc.; Roanoke Companies Group, Inc., Individually and as Successor in Interest to Roanoke Companies Group, Inc.; and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. 126 is APPROVED. In accordance therewith, Plaintiffs claims against Defendants Roanoke Companies Group, Inc., n/k/a BRTT, Inc.; Roanoke Companies Group, Inc., Individually and as Successor in Interest to Roanoke Companies Group, Inc.; and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to bear its own attorneys fees and costs by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 06/24/11. (jjh, )
|
|
Filing
119
Courtroom Minutes/Minute Order for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: Motion Hearing held on 2/18/2011, granting in part and denying in part 96 Defendants Roanoke Companies Group, Inc., Home Depot U.S.A., Inc, and Aerofil Technology, Inc.'s Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Supplement Disclosures and Plaintiff Profile Form, and granting in part and denying in part 97 Plaintiff's Motion to Extend Certain Expert Disclosure Progression Dates, for Determination of Expert Status of Cecile Rose, M.D., and for Clarification of the Application of New Amendments to Rule 26. Plaintiff's Rule 26(a)(2)(C) disclosures due by 5/30/2011. Defendant's rebuttal Rule 26(a)(2)(C) disclosures due by 6/15/2011. Fact Discovery due by 8/15/2011. Dispositive Motions due by 9/15/2011. (FTR: C. Coomes -- Courtroom A-501) (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
118
MINUTE ORDER granting 115 the unopposed Amended Motion for SLR, Inc., its Representatives and Counsel to be Excused from the Settlement Conference, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 2/17/2011. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
95
ORDER. Roanoke Defendants Partial Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) 56 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. By Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 12/16/2010.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER granting 58 Defendant Aerofil Technology, Inc.s Partial Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. In accordance therewith, judgment shall be entered in Defendant Aerofils favor on Plaintiffs claim for violation of the CCPA. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Order to Show Cause dated October 4, 2010 is hereby DISCHARGED. by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 10/8/2010.(erv, )
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER granting 81 Defendants' Innovative Chemical Technologies, Inc., and Ortec, Inc.'s Stipulated Motion for Dismissal with Prejudice. Defendant Ortec's cross-claims against Defendant Innovative Chemical Technologies, Inc., are hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and fees. by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 10/4/2010.(erv, )
|
|
Filing
74
MINUTE ORDER granting 69 Defendant Ortec, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion to be Excused from Settlement Conference, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 8/27/2010. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
66
MINUTE ORDER granting 61 Defendant Innovative Chemical Technologies, Inc.s Unopposed Motion to be Excused from Settlement Conference. Defendant Innovative Chemicals is excused from participating in the Settlement Conference scheduled to occur August 30 and 31, and September 14 and 15, 2010, in this case. by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 8/26/2010.(erv, )
|
|
Filing
49
MINUTE ORDER granting 40 Plaintiff Birdsall's Motion to Amend Complaint. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter the Amended Complaint for Damages located at docket #40-2. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 7/27/2010. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER granting 43 Motion to Dismiss Defendant party Innovative Chemical Technologies, Inc. With Prejudice each party to bear its own attorneys fees and costs. by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 7/22/2010.(erv, )
|
|
Filing
37
MINUTE ORDER granting 35 Defendant Aerofil Technology Inc.'s Unopposed Motion to Vacate and Reset the Settlement Conference set for 9/7/2010. Settlement Conference set for 8/30/2010, 8/31/2010, 9/14/2010, and 9/15/2010 at 8:30 AM each day in Courtroom C203 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Settlement Conference set for 9/8/2010 is VACATED. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 6/25/2010. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
7
CONDITIONAL ORDER OF REMAND from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation pursuant to 28 USC 1407 (a), filed on 01/07/2010. This case has been remanded from the Northern District of Georgia. (sah, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
