Himmelman et al v. Roanoke Companies Group, Inc. et al
Sandie Himmelman, Brian Himmelman and Tyler Himmelman |
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., Innovative Chemical Technologies, Inc., Ortec, Inc. and Roanoke Companies Group, Inc. (BRITT) |
Ortec, Inc. |
Innovative Chemical Technologies, Inc., SLR, Inc., Aerofil Technology, Inc., Ortec, Inc. and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. |
1:2007cv01803 |
August 27, 2007 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Jefferson |
Lewis T. Babcock |
Personal Injury- Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 81 ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE, each party to bear its own attorneys fees and costs. by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 11/1/2010. (erv, ) |
Filing 78 ORDER To ensure an accurate record, counsel for the parties shall meet and confer regarding the remaining claims and/or cross-claims and file a document with their dismissal papers due by October 29, 2010, that indicates what the correct caption is a nd that seeks to correct any errors in the electronic record (CM-ECF) regarding the status or dates of dismissal of parties. If the above caption is correct and there are no remaining crossclaims, the parties may simply affirm this in their filing. If the above caption is incorrect, the parties shall also file a motion to correct the caption. by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 10/18/2010. (erv, ) |
Filing 76 ORDER granting 75 the Stipulated Motion for Dismissal With Prejudice filed by Innovative Chemical Technologies, Inc. and Ortec, Inc. Defendant Ortec, Inc.s cross-claims against Defendant Innovative Chemical Technologies, Inc., are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with each party to bear its own costs and fees. Ortecs cross-claims against Innovative Chemical Technologies shall hereafter be taken off the caption. by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 10/4/2010.(erv, ) |
Filing 71 MINUTE ORDER granting 66 Defendant Ortec, Inc.s Unopposed Motion to be Excused from Settlement Conference, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 8/27/2010. (mehcd) |
Filing 64 MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 62 Motion to be Excluded from Settlement Conference for Cross Claimant SLR, Inc., for failure to comply with D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1A. See Hoelzel v. First Select Corp., 214 F.R.D. 634, 636 (D. Colo. 2003) by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 8/26/2010.(erv, ) |
Filing 60 ORDER granting 47 Motion to Dismiss Party Innovative Chemical Technologies, Inc., Innovative Chemical Technologies, Inc. and Innovative Chemical Technologies, Inc. with Prejudice, each party to bear its own costs and attorney fees. by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 8/17/2010.(erv, ) |
Filing 52 MINUTE ORDER granting 45 the Himmelman Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend Complaint. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter the Himmelman Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint located at docket #45-1. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 7/27/2010. (mehcd) |
Filing 43 MINUTE ORDER granting 41 Defendant Aerofil Technology Inc.'s Unopposed Motion to Vacate and Reset the Settlement Conference set for 9/7/2010. Settlement Conference set for 8/30/2010, 8/31/2010, 9/14/2010, and 9/15/2010 at 8:30 AM each day in Courtroom C203 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Settlement Conference set for 9/8/2010 is VACATED. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 6/25/2010. (mehcd) |
Filing 19 CONDITIONAL ORDER OF REMAND from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation pursuant to 28 USC 1407 (a), filed on 01/07/2010. This case has been remanded from the Northern District of Georgia.(sah, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.