Vargas v. Centura Health Corporation
Terry Vargas |
Centura Health Corporation |
1:2007cv01812 |
August 28, 2007 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Pueblo |
Marcia S. Krieger |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex) |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 122 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Philip A. Brimmer. Motion Hearing held on 12/4/2009. DENYING 102 Motion for Reconsideration. DENYING as MOOT 108 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. DENYING 111 Motion to Reopen C ase. DENYING 111 Motion to Continue. DENYING 112 Request to Introduce Affidavit. DENYING as MOOT 113 Motion to Clarify. GRANTING 118 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Normando R. Pacheco terminated. 114 Discharging Show Cause Order (Court Reporter Kara Spitler)(pabcd) |
Filing 100 ORDER granting 41 Defendant Centura Health Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment. This matter, and all claims asserted therein, is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk shall forthwith enter judgment in favor of defendant Centura Health Corporation and against plaintiff Terry Vargas. Defendant is entitled to its costs, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 8/13/09.(ebs, ) |
Filing 99 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Philip A. Brimmer. Motion Hearing held on 7/24/2009. 41 Motion for Summary Judgment is submitted and TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT. (Court Reporter Janet Coppock) (pabcd) |
Filing 97 MINUTE ORDER denying as premature 94 Plaintiff's Motion to Set Trial Date, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 6/29/09.(ebs, ) |
Filing 93 MINUTE ORDER denying 91 Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider Ruling, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 5/21/09.(ebs, ) |
Filing 90 MINUTE ORDER denying 88 Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 5/12/09.(ebs, ) |
Filing 87 MINUTE ORDER denying 85 Plaintiff's Motion for Production of Documents, for failure to confer as is required under D.C.Colo.LCivR 7.1A and Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 37, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 4/28/09.(ebs, ) |
Filing 2 ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS. Any exhibits and depositions to be used during this case, counsel for the parties shall obtain such exhibits and depositions from the Court within 30 days after any judgment is entered or closure o f the case. Counsel shall retain same for 60 days beyondthe later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. Failure to retrieve exhibits and depositions in conformance with this Order may result in their destruction. Signed by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 9/4/07. (dln, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Vargas v. Centura Health Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Terry Vargas | |
Represented By: | Matthew S. Martin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Centura Health Corporation | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.