Front Range Pipe & Supply, Inc. et al v. Voda
Jeffrey A. Weinman |
Bojar J. Voda |
Front Range Pipe & Supply, Inc. |
United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado |
1:2007cv01854 |
September 5, 2007 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Garfield |
Marcia S. Krieger |
Bankruptcy Withdrawl |
28 U.S.C. ยง 0157 (c)(1) Findings, Concl. & Proposed Judgment |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 42 OPINION AND ORDER SUSTAINING IN PART AND OVERRULING IN PART OBJECTIONS, ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION, SETTING ASIDE TRANSFER AND DIRECTING SHERIFF'S EXECUTION AGAINST PROPERTY. The Court OVERRULES Mrs. Voda's Objections and ADOPTS the Recommend ations (# 31 , 40 ). To the extent that Mrs. Voda's Objections (# 32 ) are construed as a Motion for Reconsideration, that motion is DENIED. A judgment of garnishment in favor of the Plaintiff and against Mr. and Mrs. Voda will enter contempor aneously with this Order. Within 21 days of the date of this Order, the Vodas shall deliver the Subaru wagon, VIN 4S3BH806X27609045, to the United States Marshal, who shall promptly sell the vehicle and tender the proceeds, less recoverable expenses, to the Plaintiff, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 07/19/2010.(wjc, ) |
Filing 2 Proposed FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Regarding Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment in Non-Core Proceeding. Signed by Judge Sidney B. Brooks on 8/15/2007. (llr, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.