Zeiler Farms, Inc. v. Anadarko E & P Company LP et al
Zeiler Farms, Inc. |
Anadarko E & P Company LP, Anadarko Land Company and Petroleum Development Corporation |
1:2007cv01985 |
September 20, 2007 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Weld |
Wiley Y. Daniel |
Michael J. Watanabe |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 114 ORDER denying 108 Plaintiffs' MOTION to Alter or Amend Judgment, by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 8/5/10. (lyg, ) |
Filing 107 ORDER. The following declaratory judgment is hereby entered in favor of the Defendants: It is not a breach of the Surface Owners Agreement between Zeiler Farms and Champlin Petroleum Company for Defendants to drill additional vertical wells on the Southwest Quarter Section of the Zeiler Farms Property rather than to drill such additional wells directionally. By Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 07/01/2010. (sah, ) |
Filing 106 ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 4/20/10. (wydcd, rrk) |
Filing 104 Minute Entry for Bench Trial (Day 1) held on 4/19/2010 before Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel. Denying 90 Defendant Unioil, Inc.'s Amended Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Plaintiff's Expert, Ron Briggs. (Court Reporter Therese Lindblom) (wydcd, rrk) |
Filing 93 Minute Entry for Trial Preparation Conference held before Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 4/6/2010. Deferring ruling on 90 Motion to Exclude. Parties shall file glossary of terms not later than Thursday, April 15, 2010. Counsel shall renumber exhibits and file revised exhibit lists not later than Thursday, April 15, 2010. (Court Reporter Therese Lindblom) (wydcd, rrk) |
Filing 86 ORDER that Defendant Unioils Motion to Exclude Plaintiffs Expert, Ron Briggs filed October 2, 2008 55 and Defendant Unioils Motion to Exclude Plaintiffs Expert, Basil Katsaros filed October 2, 2008 56 are DENIED with leave to re-file no later than Friday, April 2, 2010. Plaintiffs Response, if any, shall be filed by Friday, April 9, 2010. No replies will be permitted. by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 3/23/2010.(erv, ) (Modified on 3/26/2010 corrected date signed to 3/23/2010)(erv, ). |
Filing 78 ORDER Granting in part and denying in part 73 Defendants' MOTION for Entry of Judgment and to Vacate Trial Date. It is granted insofar as it requests dismissal of Plaintiff's First Claim for Relief and denied insofar as it requests dismissal of the declaratory judgment claim and entry of judgment. First Claim for Relief is dismissed with prejudice. Trial set 11/2/09 will proceed to the Court, by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 9/4/09. (gms, ) |
Filing 77 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel: granting in part and denying in part 73 Motion for Judgment; Motion Hearing held on 9/1/2009. Parties shall file proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, witness lists, and exhibit lists not later than Wednesday, September 23, 2009 in anticipation of the November 2, 2009 Trial to Court. (Court Reporter Therese Lindblom.) (wydcd, rrk) |
Filing 72 ORDER granting 30 Defendant Unioil, Incs Motion for Summary Judgment. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the portion of Plaintiffs First Claim for Relief based on Anticipatory Repudiation, and Plaintiffs Second, Third and Forth Claims for Relief are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 3/31/09.(erv, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.