Securities and Exchange Commission v. Samples et al
Securities and Exchange Commission |
Robert Ray White Samples, Pot O'Gold Financial Services, LLC and Cristella Samples |
1:2007cv02081 |
October 4, 2007 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Douglas |
Lewis T. Babcock |
Securities/Commodities |
15 U.S.C. ยง 77 Securities Fraud |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 50 ORDER granting 49 Plaintiffs Motion to Dismiss Claims for Disgorgement, Prejudgment Interest and Civil Penalties and Dismissal of Relief Defendant. It is therefore ORDERED that the claims against Relief Defendant Cristella Samples are dismissed without prejudice. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commissions claims for disgorgement, civil penalties and prejudgment interest are dismissed. by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 4/28/09.(erv, ) |
Filing 46 ORDER that the parties shall file a third status report in this matter. Status Report due by 4/27/2009. by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 4/22/09. (erv, ) (Modified on 4/24/2009 corrected file date to 4/22/09)(erv, ). |
Filing 44 ORDER: Plaintiff to file motion to close or a Status Report by 2/16/2009. Signed by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 1/22/09. (gms, ) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting 2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction Asset Freeze and Accounting. Signed by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 10/11/07.(erv, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.