Frazier v. Ortiz et al
| Keith Frazier |
| Joe Ortiz, Colorado Department of Corrections, Limon Correctional Facility, Al Estep, Lou Archuleta, DeLayne Tornowski, Anthony A. DeCesaro, Higgenbothem, A. Cosner, Office of Corrections/Legal Services, Anthony, P. Gabriel, C. Jacques, Sandi Patrick-Hendrix, Mailroom, Central Reading Committee, Cathie Holst, Accounting Department/Banking Service, Trevor Williams, Tony Outen, Mental Health/Sex Offender Treatment Program Staff, Bill Rusher, Tom O'Brien and James D. |
| 1:2007cv02131 |
| October 10, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Crowley |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
142
ORDER to Cure Deficiency re 139 Notice of Appeal by Keith Frazier, by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 04/01/10. Appellant has 30 days to either pay the filing fee or file a proper 1915 motion with district court.(bjr, )
|
|
Filing
136
ORDER that the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge 106 is ACCEPTED AND AFFIRMED as an Order of this Court. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment 68 is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED WITH PR EJUDICE. In light of that ruling, Plaintiffs Combined Motion for Summary Judgment and Response to Defendants Memorandum Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment 73 and Plaintiffs Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and an Order to Show C ause for a Preliminary Injunction 102 are DENIED AS MOOT. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall bear their own costs and attorneys fees. In light of the Courts dismissal of this case, all remaining motions, objections, and recommendations, in particular, those identified at docket numbers 87 , 88 , 112 , 113 , 123 , 125 , 129 , and 132 are DENIED AS MOOT. by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 3/11/2010.(erv, )
|
|
Filing
132
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 129 MOTION to Amend 8 Amended Complaint, by Plaintiff be DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 1/27/2010. (kmtcd, )
|
|
Filing
125
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE that 123 Plaintiff's Combined MOTION Requesting Permissions to Amend 8 Amended Complaint and Permission for Extension of Time to do so be DENIED, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 12/23/2009. (wjc, )
|
|
Filing
106
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 102 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Keith Frazier, BE DENIED, 73 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Keith Frazier, BE DENIED, 68 MOTION for Summary Judgment and M emorandum Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Al Estep, Lou Archuleta, Tom O'Brien, Sandi Patrick-Hendrix, Trevor Williams, DeLayne Tornowski, Cathie Holst, Joe Ortiz, Tony Outen, C. Jacques, Bill Rusher, BE GRANTED and this case Dismissed in its entirety, with Prejudice by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 8/21/09. (erv, )
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER denying 80 Plaintiffs Motion Requesting Permission to Amend Complaint to Add Previously Unknown Defendants.By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 06/30/2009.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
58
MINUTE ORDER denying 56 Plaintiff's Motion for Order to Compel Compliance With Request for Limited Interrogatories and Production of Documents by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 4/8/09.(erv, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
