Emert et al v. Warner et al
| Ellery Emert and Cristy Emert |
| Josh Warner, Anita C. Abeyta, Jeremy Cade Arnold, Crystal Johnson and Brooke Pace |
| 1:2007cv02400 |
| November 15, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Mesa |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. The Court finds that the Plaintiffs have failed to prosecute their claims against the remaining Defendants, and further, that they have willfully violated Court orders intended to promptl y and efficiently advance this case. Thus, the remaining claims in this action against Defendants Arnold, Johnson, and the unknown SWAT team members are DISMISSED for failure to prosecute under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). The Clerk of the Court shall close this case, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 08/03/09. (wjc, )
|
|
Filing
63
Opinion and ORDER granting 39 MCSD Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. The claims against Defendants Warner, Abeyta, and Pace are Dismissed for failure to state a claim under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), and the caption of the case is Amended to omit reference to these Defendants. The MCSD Defendants' 47 Motion to Refer is denied as moot, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 02/09/09.(wjc, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
