Conagra Trade Group, Inc. v. Fuel Exploration, LLC
Plaintiff: Conagra Trade Group, Inc.
Defendant: Fuel Exploration, LLC
Case Number: 1:2007cv02438
Filed: November 20, 2007
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Wiley Y. Daniel
Presiding Judge: Michael E. Hegarty
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 13, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 106 ORDER granting 104 Joint Motion for Order Approving Amended Stipulation for Confession of Judgment. It is hereby ORDERED that the Amended Stipulation for Confession of Judgment 105 is hereby approved and made an Order of the Court. It is FURTHER ORDERED that this Courts Order 103 , dated December 31, 2009, approving the original Stipulation for Confession of Judgment 103 is hereby VACATED. by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 1/13/2010.(erv, )
June 3, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 76 ORDER granting in part and taking under advisement in part 49 ConAgras Motion for Summary Judgment. The Motion is GRANTED to the extent that all issues of liability are hereby resolved in favor of ConAgra and Fuel Exs counterclaims are DISMISSED WI TH PREJUDICE. The Motion is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT to determine the amount of damages suffered by ConAgra. Each party will bear its own costs. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Joint Motion and Stipulation to Continue the Pretrial Conference 73 is referred to the magistrate judge for further handling and scheduling. by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 6/3/09.(erv, )
March 25, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER granting 66 Fuel Exploration, LLCs Motion to Reopen Discovery for Damage Issues. Final Pretrial Conference set for 6/4/2009 09:30 AM in Courtroom C203 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 3/25/09.(erv, )
March 19, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER granting 51 Motion to Strike 50 Defendant Fuel Exploration, LLC Response in Opposition to ConAgras Motion for Summary Judgment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Response of Defendant Fuel Exploration, LLC By Counsel in Opposition to ConAgras Motion for Summary Judgment 63 , is accepted as timely filed. by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 3/19/09.(erv, )
February 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 56 MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part 54 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Leave to Appear at Pretrial Conference by Telephone. Final Pretrial Conference is converted to a Status Conference set for 2/9/2009 at 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 02/05/09.(wjc, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Conagra Trade Group, Inc. v. Fuel Exploration, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Conagra Trade Group, Inc.
Represented By: J. Thomas Macdonald
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fuel Exploration, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?