Montoya v. Hartley et al
| David C. Montoya |
| Steve Hartley and Colorado Attorney General |
| 1:2008cv00152 |
| January 24, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Lincoln |
| Walker D. Miller |
| Kathleen M. Tafoya |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
ORDER On Petition For Habeas Corpus. Applicant David C. Montoyas Application Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 For Writ of Habeas Corpus (Application) 3 is denied. No certificate of appealability will issue because Applicant has not made asubstantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. This case is dismissed with prejudice. By Judge Walker D. Miller on 05/03/2010. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER: On or before 3/1/2010, the Clerk of the Denver District Court shall provide to this court the original written record, including transcripts, of Denver criminal case no. 04CR4113, People v. David C. Montoya. Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order by fax and by regular mail, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 1/19/10. (ebs, )
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER to Answer 3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by David C. Montoya. Respondents shall file an answer on or before 3/8/08. Signed by Judge Walker D. Miller on 02/08/2008. (sah2, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
