Zimmerman v. Arp et al
| Rick L. Zimmerman |
| Randall (I) C. Arp, Randall C. Arp, CIT Group, Inc., The, CIT Group/Consumer Finance, Inc., The, Jeffrey (I) M. Peek, Jeffrey M. Peek, Roy (I) Stringfellow, Roy Stringfellow, John A. Lobus and Law Firm of John A. Lobus, The |
| 1:2008cv00246 |
| February 5, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Douglas |
| Kristen L. Mix |
| Zita L. Weinshienk |
| Truth in Lending |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
92
ORDER OF DISMISSAL Sustaining in part and overruling in part 77 Plaintiffs' Objection to Magistrate Judge's Recommendation. Accepting and adopting as modified by this Order 72 Report and Recommendation. Granting 34 CIT Defendants� 39; Motion to Dismiss. Denying 44 Lobus Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. Granting 44 Lobus Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Denying as moot 61 Plaintiff's Renewed Motion for Injunc tive Relief pursuant to Rule 65 F.R.C.P. Denying as moot 64 Plaintiff's Motion to Invoke Supplemental Jurisdiction. Denying 73 Plaintiff's Motion for Declaratory Judgment. Denying 74 Plaintiff's Motion for Declaratory Judgment Regarding Filing in Improper Judicial District. Denying as moot 81 CIT Defendants' Motion to Supplement Responses. This case and cause of action are dismissed, the parties to pay their own costs and attorney fees, by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 3/31/09.(ebs, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
