Braddock Financial Corporation v. Washington Mutual Bank
Plaintiff: Braddock Financial Corporation
Defendant: Washington Mutual Bank
Case Number: 1:2008cv00265
Filed: February 7, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Denver
Presiding Judge: Walker D. Miller
Presiding Judge: Michael E. Hegarty
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 22, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 88 ORDER granting 87 Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion for Administrative Closure Pursuant to Rule 41.2, this case is administratively closed to be reopened for good cause shown. It is FURTHER ORDERED that a status report shall be filed on or before Friday, June 25, 2010. by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 12/22/09.(erv, ) (Modified on 12/29/2009 corrected Status Report date to 6/25/2010)(erv, ).
November 2, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 73 MINUTE ORDER granting 70 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Stay or, in the Alternative, Extension of Time for Joinder of Parties and Amendment of Pleadings. The stay imposed on 9/14/2009 is extended to and including 11/30/2009. Tel ephonic Status Conference set for 12/3/2009 09:30 AM in Courtroom C203 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. The parties shall conference together and call Chambers at (303) 844-4507 at the designated time. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 11/2/2009. (mehcd)
October 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 69 MINUTE ORDER withdrawing 67 Motion to Stay and granting 68 Motion to Withdraw entered by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 10/30/09. (wydcd, rrk)
March 26, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 19 Defendants Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6. It is denied as to Plaintiffs first claim for relief and granted as to Plaintiffs second and third claims for relief. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiffs second and third claims for relief are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 3/26/09.(erv, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Braddock Financial Corporation v. Washington Mutual Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Braddock Financial Corporation
Represented By: Jonathon David Bergman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Washington Mutual Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?