Nasious v. Denver, City and County of et al
| John Nasious |
| Denver, City and County of, Lovinger, Strong, Denver Health Medical Center, Rosie Pagiano, Colorado Department of Corrections - Office of Correctional Legal Services - Legal Access Program, Cathie Holst, Cathie (I) Holst, (I) Lovinger, (I) Strong and Rosie (I) Pagiano |
| 1:2008cv00275 |
| February 8, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Fremont |
| Zita L. Weinshienk |
| Kathleen M. Tafoya |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
222
ORDER Adopting and Affirming 214 Report and Recommendations: 181 Motion for Summary Judgment, 182 Motion for Summary Judgment, and 187 Motion for Summary Judgment are granted. In forma pauperis on appeal is denied. This case is dismissed with prejudice. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 10/10/12. (dkals, )
|
|
Filing
221
ORDER to Withdraw Court Order and Reopen Case: 217 Order and 219 Final Judgment are witdrawn by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 10/9/12. (dkals, )
|
|
Filing
219
FINAL JUDGMENT by Clerk in favor of Denver, City and County of, Strong, (I) Strong, Rosie Pagiano, Rosie (I) Pagiano against John Nasious by Clerk on 9/27/12. (dkals, )
|
|
Filing
179
MINUTE ORDER denying 172 Motion to Strike Defendat's [sic] Deposition of John Nasious as Premature from Discovery and Not Allow Admission to Court Docut [sic]. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 12/14/2011.(jjpsl, )
|
|
Filing
176
ORDER AFFIRMING OCTOBER 20, 2011 RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Plaintiff's 173 Objections are overruled and the Court hereby adopts and affirms the 171 Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this Court. Plaintiff's 161 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint is denied. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 11/9/11.(mnfsl, )
|
|
Filing
170
MINUTE ORDER granting 164 Plaintiffs Motion to Extend Discovery Due to No Ruling on Amended Complaint; Discovery due by 12/15/2011; Dispositive Motions due by 1/17/2012; Final Pretrial Conference set for 3/12/2012 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 10/20/2011.(ervsl, )
|
|
Filing
167
MINUTE ORDER denying 165 Plaintiffs Objection to Defendant Rosie Paglianos Response and to Strike Motion from the Record as Untimely Resoponse by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 9/28/2011.(erv, )
|
|
Filing
157
ORDER Due to a scheduling conflict, the final pretrial conference set in this matter for January 24, 2012 at 9:45 a.m. is VACATED. Final Pretrial Conference Reset for 1/17/2012 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 7/13/2011. (erv, )
|
|
Filing
145
ORDER Preliminary Scheduling Conference set for 4/25/2011 09:00 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 4/18/2011. (erv, )
|
|
Filing
138
MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiffs letter to the Clerk requesting that this case be reassigned to the Chief District Judge of this District 134 is DENIED. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 3/28/2011.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
136
ORDER. A Preliminary Scheduling Conference is set for 4/18/2011 09:00 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 3/25/2011. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
135
ORDER REINSTATING CASE. This civil action is reinstated. This action is referred to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), and in accordance with the Order Of Reference To Magistrate Judge filed 4/16/2008 13 . By Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 3/23/2011. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
121
ORDER. The Court approves and adopts the September 15, 2009, Recommendation Of United States Magistrate Judge 90 , and it is ORDERED that the Motion To Dismiss Defendants City And County Of Denver, Denver Sheriffs Department, And Sheriff Strong [85 ] is granted. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Amended Prisoner Complaint and cause of action are dismissed with prejudice, the parties to pay their own costs and attorneys fees. It is FURTHER ORDERED that a separate Judgment shall issue pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a). By Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 03/31/2010.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
117
ORDER. The Motion To Dismiss By Rosemary Pagliano, R.N. 42 is granted. All claims against Defendant Rosemary Pagliano, identified as Nurse Rosie Pagliano on the pleading caption, are dismissed with prejudice. The case caption is amended to reflect the dismissal of Defendant Rosemary Pagliano. By Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 01/20/2010.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
101
ORDER. On or before 11/30/2009, Defendants the City and County of Denver, Denver Sheriffs Department, and Sheriff Strong (the Denver Defendants) shall file a brief in response to Plaintiff Nasious Response To Defendants Motion To Dismiss 100 , which the Court treats as Plaintiffs objection to the Recommendation of Magistrate Judge issued 09/15/2009 90 . By Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 11/04/2009. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
97
ORDER denying 91 Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions for Denver Defendants Failure to Comply with F.R.C.P; granting Plaintiff's 92 Motion for Extension of Time to File Objection to Magistrate Recommendation, to no later than 10/26/09. Clerk to mail copy of defendants' motion to dismiss along with this order, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 9/30/09.(gmssl, )
|
|
Filing
90
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 85 MOTION to Dismiss Defendants City and County of Denver, Denver Sheriff's Department, and Sheriff Strong by Defendants (I) Strong, Denver, City and County of, Strong be GRANTED, and that Plaintiffs claims against the City Defendants be dismissed in their entirety, with prejudice. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 9/15/09. (kmtcd)
|
|
Filing
69
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the 42 MOTION to Dismiss Party Nurse Rosie Pagliano filed by Rosie (I) Pagiano, Rosie Pagiano be granted and that plaintiff's claims against her be dismissed in their entirety with prejudice, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 6/12/09. (gmssl, )
|
|
Filing
66
MINUTE ORDER granting 64 Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Reply in Objection of Defendants 2nd Motion to Dismiss and to Strike Or, in the Alternative, Motion for Leave to File Sur-reply 61 MOTION to Strike 42 MOTION to Dismiss Party Nurse Rosie Pagliano. Accordingly, document 61 is STRICKEN. by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 4/15/09.(erv, )
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER denying as moot 46 Motion to Notify Court that Nasious Needs Assistance. Order granting 49 Motion to Strike Second Amended Prisoner Complaint. Order denying 54 Motion to Strike Defendant Nurse Rosie Pagliano's Motion to Dismiss and Response to Second Amended Complaint. The Motion will be considered a response to the pending motion to dismiss and the Clerk of Court shall make a docket annotation to relfect the same by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 03/09/09.(jjh, )
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER. On or before 1/15/09 plaintiff to make required monthly payment or show cause why he has no assets or means by which to make the monthly payments. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 1/5/09. (gms, )
|
|
Filing
1
ORDER Directing Clerk to Commence Civil Action and Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiency. Plaintiff has 30 days to either pay the $350.00 filing fee or to file a Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. Signed by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 2/6/2008. (llk, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
