Fasteners, Inc. v. RL Industries, Inc. et al
| Fasteners, Inc. |
| RL Industries, Inc., Cindy Wormington and Steve Konfrst |
| 1:2008cv00292 |
| February 11, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Arapahoe |
| Richard P. Matsch |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1030 g Fraud & Related Matters in Connection w/ Computers |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
72
ORDER for Dismissal. Ordered that all claims and counterclaims asserted by Plaintiff Fasteners, Inc. and Defendants RTK Enterprises, Inc. f/k/a Kemper Products, Inc., and Randall Mills Kemp are dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear their own attorneys fees and costs by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 06/02/09. (jjh, )
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER granting 69 Motion to Dismiss Party. ORDERED, that the Complaint is dismissed with prejudice as to Defendant Wormington only, and the counter claim of Wormington against Plaintiff, Fasteners, is dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear their own costs and attorney's fees by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 03/19/09.(jjh, )
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER Modifying 59 Scheduling Order: modified to reflect a March 30, 2009,deadline for Defendants' expert reports. Terminating 66 and 67 Motions. Signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 3/2/2009.(rpmcd)
|
|
Filing
65
Stipulated PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 1/14/2009. (rpmcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
