Wiese v. Centex Homes
Chad M. Wiese |
Centex Homes |
1:2008cv00377 |
February 24, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Denver |
Michael E. Hegarty |
Zita L. Weinshienk |
Labor: Other |
38 U.S.C. ยง 4302 Veterans Reemployment Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 100 ORDER 3 Day Court Trial set 10/26/09 is vacated. If stipulation or motion to dismiss is not filed by 11/10/09, case will be dismissed without prejudice, by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 10/19/09. (gmssl, ) |
Filing 88 ORDER granting 79 Defendant's Motion in Limine to Preclude Plaintiff from Providing Expert Testimony, by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 9/30/09.(gms, ) Modified on 10/2/2009 to remove the words "Order on" from the text (gmssl, ). |
Filing 77 ORDER denying 69 Defendant's Motion to Certify Order for Interlocutory Appeal and to Stay Further Proceedings Pending Interlocutory Appeal, by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 9/2/09.(gmssl, ) |
Filing 68 ORDER 3 day Jury Trial set for 10/26/2009 10:30 AM in Courtroom A 801 before Judge Zita L. Weinshienk. Status Report due by 9/23/2009. Trial Preparation Conference set for 9/30/2009 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom A 801 before Judge Zita L. Weinshienk, by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 6/29/09. (gmssl, ) |
Filing 64 ORDER granting 43 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, Denying 41 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Case will proceed to a jury trial on the issue of damages, by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 6/2/09.(gms, ) |
Filing 62 ORDER Defendant's 60 Notice of Withdrawal of Motion to Seal is treated as a motion to withdraw and it is granted. Defendant's 40 MOTION to Seal is withdrawn. Exhibits E,I,J,K,L.N and O ( 42 Sealed Document) shall be unsealed, by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 5/27/09. (gmssl, ) |
Filing 58 ORDER Denying 40 Defendant's MOTION to Seal without prejudice. Defendant may re-file the motion to seal. The exhibits to the motion for summary judgment shall remain under seal until further order of the court, by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 5/15/09. (gms, ) |
Filing 47 ORDER granting 33 Defendant's Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Expert Witness. Plaintiff's Rule 26(a)(2) expert disclosure is hereby stricken, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 3/31/09.(ebs, ) |
Filing 32 ORDER Protecting Confidential Material. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 1/16/09. (gms, ) |
Filing 29 ORDER denying 27 Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order to Hold Videotaped Deposition of Plaintiff Chad M. Wiese by Telephone or in a Neutral Location. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 1/12/09.(gms, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Wiese v. Centex Homes | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Chad M. Wiese | |
Represented By: | George C. Aucoin, Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Centex Homes | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.