Wolff v. Abbott et al
| Douglas L. Wolff |
| James Abbott and John Suthers |
| 1:2008cv00395 |
| February 26, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
| Fremont |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS. Petitioner Douglas Wolff's 3 Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED. No certificate of appealability will issue because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. The Clerk of the Court shall close this case, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 07/07/2010. (wjc, )
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER: re: 3 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Douglas L. Wolff. On or before March 5, 2010, the respondents shall provide the Court with the complete record from the state trial court and all briefs and pleadings filed in the state supreme and appellate courts in the criminal prosecution and post- conviction proceedings that underlie the Application, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 2/3/10. (bnbcd, )
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER: re: Denying 24 The petitioners Supplemental Motion Requesting this Court to Respond to a 28 U.S.C.A. 2254 at this Courts Earliest Convenience, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 9/4/09.(bnbcd, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
