Dubrovin v. Ball Corporation Consolidated Welfare Benefit Plan for Employees, The et al
Plaintiff: Barbara K. Dubrovin
Defendant: Ball Corporation Consolidated Welfare Benefit Plan for Employees, The, Ball Corporation Long-Term Disability Coverage Plan, The, Ball Corporation, Ball Corporation Employee Benefits Administration Committee, The and Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp.
Case Number: 1:2008cv00563
Filed: March 19, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Labor: E.R.I.S.A. Office
County: Larimer
Presiding Judge: Walker D. Miller
Presiding Judge: Kathleen M. Tafoya
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 156 ORDER of Dismissal. Ordered that the Stipulated Motion for Dismissal 155 is GRANTED and this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with each party to pay her or its own costs and expenses by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 03/23/11. (jjh, )
December 28, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 147 MINUTE ORDER granting 142 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Permission to File Supplemental Response to Defendants' Rule 59(e) Motion. A status conference and motion hearing set for 2/10/2011 at 10:00 AM before Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel, by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 12/28/10.(mnf, )
September 29, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 129 ORDER that Plaintiffs Motion for Summary judgment on the Merits Based Upon Judicial Review Under ERISA 117 , is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART consistent with this Order. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment 108 , i s GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART consistent with this Order. Finally, it is ORDERED that on or before Wednesday, October 13, 2010, the parties shall file a status report as to the second claim for relief and what action needs to occur as to same. by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 9/29/2010.(erv, )
March 3, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 123 MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part 122 Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Reply Brief or, in the alternative, to Allow Defendants to File a Reply 122 . Specifically, the portion of the motion that seeks to strike Plaintiffs Reply Br ief 121 is DENIED. While the Scheduling Order did not permit reply briefs without leave of Court, the Courts Order of December 23, 2009, confused the issue by referring the parties to the deadlines in D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1 for both response and reply briefs. Accordingly, Plaintiff could reasonably have believed that she had been given leave to file a reply. In the interest of fairness that Defendants should be granted leave to file a reply brief. The portion of Defendants motion that seeks leave to file a reply brief is GRANTED. Defendants reply is due on or before Thursday, March 18, 2010. Entered by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 3/3/10. (wydcd, rrk)
December 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 116 ORDER granting as to the merits but denying as to the request for attorney fees and costs 110 Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Brief on the Merits and Plaintiff's Statement of Facts. Striking 105 Plaintiff's Motion fo r Judgment on the Merits, 106 Plaintiff's Opening Brief on the Merits Under ERISA, and 107 Statement of Facts Brief in Support. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date of this Order to file a summary judgment motion, by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 12/23/09.(ebs, )
June 10, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 97 MINUTE ORDER granting 79 Defendants Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Response in Excess of Page Limits by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 6/10/09.(erv, )
May 4, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 95 ORDER granting 87 Defendants Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Reply to Defendants Discovery Responses; STRIKING 76 Defendants' Response to Discovery Order of December 31, 2008, STRIKING 85 Response to Objection to Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision. The request for attorneys fees and costs by defendants is DENIED. by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 5/4/09.(erv, )
May 1, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 94 ORDER denying 69 Defendant's Motion to Clarify by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 5/1/09.(erv, )
February 6, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 81 Minute ORDER granting 80 Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Response in Excess of Page Limits, by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 2/6/09.(gmssl, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dubrovin v. Ball Corporation Consolidated Welfare Benefit Plan for Employees, The et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Barbara K. Dubrovin
Represented By: Dennis P. Walker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ball Corporation Consolidated Welfare Benefit Plan for Employees, The
Represented By: Catherine Cochrane Crane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ball Corporation Long-Term Disability Coverage Plan, The
Represented By: Catherine Cochrane Crane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ball Corporation
Represented By: Catherine Cochrane Crane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ball Corporation Employee Benefits Administration Committee, The
Represented By: Catherine Cochrane Crane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp.
Represented By: Catherine Cochrane Crane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?