Al-Karim v. Mukasey et al
Sami Al-Karim |
Michael Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Robert M. Cowan, Robert Mather and Robert S. Mueller, III |
1:2008cv00671 |
April 2, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Naturalization Application Office |
Denver |
Edward W. Nottingham |
Naturalization Application |
U.S. Government Defendant |
08:1101 (08:1101 Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 61 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The Joint Stipulated Motion To Dismiss 60 filed 12/22/2010, is GRANTED. Any pending motion is DENIED as moot. This action is DISMISSED. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 12/23/2010. (sah, ) |
Filing 53 MINUTE ORDER. The Joint Stipulation Re: Abeyance of EAJA Fee Motion 52 is GRANTED. The matter is held in abeyance until 11/01/2010. The parties shall file another report regarding the status of this matter by 11/08/2010. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 09/21/2010.(sah, ) |
Filing 49 MINUTE ORDER. The Joint Motion For Leave To Submit Corrected Briefs 48 is GRANTED. The parties shall have leave to re-file corrected response and reply briefs that are compliant with this courts practice standard, and the concomitant exhibits to each brief, on or before 09/10/2010. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 08/30/2010.(sah, ) |
Filing 38 MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiffs Motion To Withdraw Motion For Attorneys Fees 37 filed 06/23/2010 is GRANTED. Plaintiffs Motion For Attorneys Cost and Fees (With Scanned PDF Attachments) 36 filed 06/23/2010, is WITHDRAWN. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 06/24/2010.(sah, ) |
Filing 33 ORDER. Unopposed Motion by Defendants To Modify Order 32 filed 04/12/2010, is GRANTED. Paragraph 4 of my Order Re: Motions for Summary Judgment 30 entered 03/29/2010, IS STRICKEN and that the following language SHALL BESUBSTITUTED in its place. That the USCIS SHALL ISSUE plaintiff a Notice of Intent To Deny (NOID) by 04/16/2010, and SHALL ADJUDICATE plaintiffs I-485application by 06/15/2010." By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 04/13/2010.(sah, ) |
Filing 30 ORDER. Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment 25 filed 06/10/2009, is DENIED. Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment 24 filed 06/10/2009, is GRANTED insofar as it seeks adjudication of his I-485 application under the APA. Plaintiffs claims for adjudication of his I-485 application under theMandamus Act and the Immigration and Nationality Act are DISMISSED. TUSCIS SHALL ADJUDICATE plaintiffs I-485 application within thirty (30) days of the date of this order. Within fourteen (14) days of the adjudication of plaintiffs I-485 application, defendants SHALL FILE a notice with the court reporting the outcome of the adjudication. Within ten (10) days of the date of this order, plaintiff SHALL FILE a notice specifying the claims that remain in this lawsuit and suggesting what further action, if any, is anticipated, requested, or required in this matter. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 03/29/2010.(sah, ) |
Filing 22 ORDER denying 14 Defendants Motion To Dismiss Amended Complaint. Within sixty (60) days of the date of this order, defendants shall provide to the court and to plaintiff evidence specific to plaintiffs application demonstrating why the delay in ad judicating his application is reasonable. Motions for summary judgment MAY BE FILED no more than fifteen (15) days after plaintiff receives the evidence described in paragraph 2 above with subsequent briefing deadlines as prescribed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(c). by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 03/25/2009.(sah, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.