CH2M Hill, Inc. et al v. Alexander
Plaintiff: CH2M Hill, Inc. and CH2M Hill Companies, LTD
Defendant: Keith Alexander
Case Number: 1:2008cv00718
Filed: April 8, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Labor: E.R.I.S.A. Office
County: Douglas
Presiding Judge: Boyd N. Boland
Presiding Judge: Edward W. Nottingham
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 29:1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 11, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 76 ORDER OF DISMISSAL re: 75 Motion to Dismiss. This action is Dismissed With Prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 06/11/09.(wjc, )
May 11, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 68 MINUTE ORDER: Dismissal Paper due by 5/22/2009. All future hearings set before Magistrate Judge Watanabe are vacated. All pending motions ( 64 Motion to Compel) are denied without prejudice, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 05/11/09.(wjc, )
May 8, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER: Dismissal Paper due by 5/22/2009, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 05/08/09. (wjc, )
April 27, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 63 MINUTE ORDER granting 61 Unopposed Motion for Permission for Defendant to Appear at Settlement Conference by Telephone. Defendant's counsel is to have available a telephone number where defendant can be reached during the course of the Settlement Conference on 05/08/09, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 04/27/09.(wjc, )
April 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER granting 57 Unopposed Motion of Plaintiffs to Modify the Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 5/22/2009. Dispositive Motions due by 5/29/2009. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 7/28/2009. Final Pretrial Conference set for 8/3/2009 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 04/16/09.(wjc, )
March 12, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER granting 29 Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss Defendant's Counterclaims. The defendant's counterclaims are dismissed without prejudice, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 03/12/09.(wjc, )
January 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER granting 51 Joint Motion to Modify Scheduling Order. Scheduling Order deadlines shall be modified as follows: Discovery Cutoff 04/01/09 and Dispositive Motion Deadline 04/10/09. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 01/14/09.(wjc, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CH2M Hill, Inc. et al v. Alexander
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CH2M Hill, Inc.
Represented By: Stephen H. Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CH2M Hill Companies, LTD
Represented By: Stephen H. Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Keith Alexander
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?