RE/MAX International, Inc. v. First American Residential Group, Inc.
RE/MAX International, Inc. |
First American Residential Group, Inc. |
1:2008cv00774 |
April 16, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Contract: Other Office |
Denver |
Lewis T. Babcock |
Craig B Shaffer |
Plaintiff |
Diversity |
28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 105 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The parties filed a Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice. The Stipulation is granted. The above action is dismissed with prejudice, with each party to pay its own costs and legal fees. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 10/27/2009. (sah, ) |
Filing 99 AMENDED ORDER re: 98 Order. On or before 10/28/2009, the parties shall file (1) one hard copy of each deposition transcript to be introduced at trial with designations by Plaintiff highlighted in blue, designations by Defendant highlighted in yell ow, and objections highlighted in red with an interlineation as to the basis for the objection indicated; (2) proposed draft Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law; (3) short trial briefs highlighting any evidentiary issues that the parties anticipate will arise during the trial; (4) and updated exhibit lists reflecting stipulations and objections. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 10/06/2009. (sah, ) |
Filing 98 ORDER. By stipulation of the parties, Plaintiffs Second Claim for Relief for unjust enrichment is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. A five-day trial to the court in this case shall commence on 11/02/2009 at 9:00 a.m.. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 10/06/2009. (sah, ) |
Filing 91 ORDER. The trial preparation conference held on 10/02/2009, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a further trial preparation conference is set for 10/06/2009 at 9:00 a.m. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 10/02/2009. (sah, ) |
Filing 87 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 58 Re/Maxs Motion forSummary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, for Partial Summary Judgment. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 09/09/2009.(sah, ) |
Filing 57 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B Shaffer: Motion Hearing held on 2/27/2009. Plaintiffs Motion to Strike Defendants Expert Disclosures 40 filed 1/5/09 is DENIED without prejudice. For reasons stated on the record, the Court will not require Plaintiff to disclose the documents pertaining to Larry Wall. However, the Court will allow the deposition of Mr. Walls to be reopened (Court Reporter FTR- Cathy Coomes.) (sah, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: RE/MAX International, Inc. v. First American Residential Group, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: RE/MAX International, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Stephanie Ann Ries |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: First American Residential Group, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Karl D. Kaesemeyer |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.