Heilman v. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company
Plaintiff: Grant Heilman
Defendant: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company
Case Number: 1:2008cv00775
Filed: April 16, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Copyright Office
County: Chaffee
Presiding Judge: Marcia S. Krieger
Presiding Judge: Craig B Shaffer
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 1, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 132 ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY PLAN approved by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 3/1/10. (cbssec)
February 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 126 TRIAL PREPARATION ORDER-CIVIL: Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/25/2011 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom A 901 before Judge Marcia S. Krieger. Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 2/17/10. (msksec, )
November 2, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 112 Minute Entry for Motion Hearing proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 11/2/09: Granting 107 Motion to Amend/Correct/Modify subject to (1)Plaintiff Heilman's putative class claims in the Second Amended complaint are Dismi ssed with Prejudice and without objection, and (2)Plaintiff's counsel will return all discovery produced in conjunction with class discovery subject to further discussions under Local Rule 7.1A. The Motion To Amend 107 is Granted Without Prejudice to defendant's right to file a separate motion for an award of fees and costs, as specified. (FTR Court Reporter - B. Abiakam) (babia)
August 26, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 98 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS: Defendant Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Companys 53 motion to dismiss the claims of Ms. Honeywood for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is GRANTED. The claims asserted by Varnette P. Honeywood are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Defendant Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Companys 71 motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) is DENIED AS MOOT, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 08/25/09.(wjc, )
March 31, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 72 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 03/31/09. (wjc, )
February 12, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 58 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B Shaffer: Motion Hearing held on 2/12/2009 denying 39 Motion to Bifurcate. Scheduling Conference set for 3/13/2009 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom A 402; the parties shall submit a proposed Scheduling Order for the first phrase discovery on or before February 27, 2009 before Magistrate Judge Craig B Shaffer. (FTR - Ginny Kramer.) (rebcd, ) Modified on 2/13/2009 to delete and rearrange text (wjc, ).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Heilman v. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Grant Heilman
Represented By: Jeffrey Alan Springer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?