Baker v. AirServ Corporation et al
| Richard Baker |
| AirServ Corporation and United Airlines Inc. |
| 1:2008cv00913 |
| May 2, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
| Denver |
| Kristen L. Mix |
| Edward W. Nottingham |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Race) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
83
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to the 82 Joint Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), this matter, and all claims asserted therein, is dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys fees and costs, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 3/22/10. (ebs, )
|
|
Filing
78
MINUTE ORDER granting 77 Motion to Clarify the Nature and Effect of Plaintiff's Objections to Defendants' Proposed Exhibits. Objections made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3)(B) preserve the ability of a party to make such objections at trial. The Court will not rule on such objections until they are made at trial. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 8/10/09. (pabsec)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER Four-Day Jury Trial set for 4/5/2010 08:00 AM in Courtroom A 601 before Judge Philip A. Brimmer. Trial Preparation Conference set for 3/19/2010 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom A 601 before Judge Philip A. Brimmer, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 6/25/09. (ebs, )
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER granting 51 Defendants' Expedited Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and the brief in support thereof. Striking 48 Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Striking for all purposes 49 Plaintiff's Combined Brief in Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and in support of his own Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. On or before Wednesday, April 22, 2009, plaintiff shall file an amended respon se that only addresses defendants motion for summary judgment and that otherwise complies with my practice standards, see Practice Standards (Civil case), Judge Philip A. Brimmer § III.F.3.b. Defendants shall have fifteen days from the day plaintiffs response is filed to file a reply, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 4/20/09.(ebs, )
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER denying 35 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories, to Produce Documents and to Provide Other Discovery, for the reasons set forth in this Order. No opposed discovery motions are to be filed with the Court until the part ies comply with D.C.Colo.L.Civ.R.7.1(A). If the parties are unable to reach agreement on a discovery issue after conferring, they shall arrange a conference call with Magistrate Judge Mix to attempt to resolve the issue. Both of these steps must be completed before any future contested discovery motions are filed with the Court, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 4/9/09.(ebs, )
|
|
Filing
47
MINUTE ORDER denying 45 Defendant Air Serv Corporation's Motion for Leave to File Sur-reply to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 4/3/09.(ebs, )
|
|
Filing
31
MINUTE ORDER granting 29 Second Joint Motion for Modification of the Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 3/9/2009. Dispositive Motions due by 3/20/2009 by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 1/30/09. (ecm, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
