Cairns v. UBS Financial Services, Inc. et al
| Donn Cairns |
| UBS Financial Services, Inc., Patrick Cox and Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc. |
| 1:2008cv00938 |
| May 6, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
| El Paso |
| Lewis T. Babcock |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 29:623 Job Discrimination (Age) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. A Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice was filed on 09/22/2009. This matter shall be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to pay their own fees and costs. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 09/23/2009. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
57
MINUTE ORDER granting 54 Undisputed Joint Motion to Vacate 06/16/2009 Settlement Conference by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 06/11/2009.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
53
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 04/21/2009. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER granting 42 plaintiffs Motion to Compel Attendance of UBS Representative at Deposition. The defendant shall make Mr. Giordano available for his deposition on 04/24/2009 by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 04/03/2009.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER. A Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice of Morgan Stanley and Patrick Cox was filed 02/26/2009. This matter shall be Dismissed With Prejudice as to Defendants Morgan Stanley & Co.,Inc., and Patrick Cox only, each party to pay their own fees and costs by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 02/27/2009. (sah, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
