Lobato v. Cougar
Plaintiff: Scott R. Lobato
Defendant: Dan (I) Cougar and Dan Cougar
Case Number: 1:2008cv01192
Filed: August 4, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
Presiding Judge: Lewis T. Babcock
Presiding Judge: Michael E. Hegarty
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 4, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 110 ORDER. A Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice was filed on 08/03/2009. This matter shall be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to pay their own fees and costs. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 08/04/2009. (sah, )
June 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 103 ORDER granting 95 Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 06/29/2009.(sah, )
March 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 75 ORDER. A Stipulated Motion to Dismiss Defendants Mr. Black, Art Ortega, Mr. Norton, John Doe, and Jane Doe only With Prejudice was filed on 03/19/2009. This matter shall be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to Defendants Mr. Black, Art Ortega, Mr. Norton, John Doe, and Jane Doe only, each party to pay their own fees and costs by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 03/23/2009.(sah, )
February 25, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 71 ORDER accepting 64 the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. Defendant Bobby Howards Motion to Dismiss 35 is DENIED AS MOOT by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 02/25/2009.(sah, )
February 12, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 68 Minute Entry/Minute Order for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: Motion Hearing held on 2/12/2009, granting in part and denying in part 65 Motion to Amend/Correct/Modify. Set Hearing: Supplemental Scheduling Conference set for 3/26/2009 09:45 AM in Courtroom C203 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. (Court Reporter FTR - C. Coomes) (mehcd)
February 3, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 64 RECOMMENDATION ON DEFENDANT HOWARDS MOTION TO DISMISS: that 35 Defendant Bobby Howard's MOTION to Dismiss, which was converted into a Motion for Summary Judgment 53 BE DENIED AS MOOT by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 02/03/2009. (sah, )
January 28, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 61 MINUTE ORDER striking 59 Defendant Bobby Howards Motion to Stay Discovery. by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 01/28/2009.(sah, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lobato v. Cougar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Scott R. Lobato
Represented By: David Arthur Lane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dan (I) Cougar
Represented By: Jonathan Ariel Cross
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dan Cougar
Represented By: Jonathan Ariel Cross
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?