United of Omaha Life Insurance Company v. Johnson
Plaintiff: United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Defendant: Kris P. Johnson
Case Number: 1:2008cv01287
Filed: June 17, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Insurance Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Robert E. Blackburn
Presiding Judge: Boyd N. Boland
Nature of Suit: Defendant
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 74 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to the 73 Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), this matter, and all claims asserted therein, is dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 1/8/10. (ebs, )
December 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 66 ORDER: I am informed that this case has been resolved. On or before 12/31/2009, the parties shall file a stipulation or motion to dismiss with prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 12/17/09. (ebs, )
October 15, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 63 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Philip A. Brimmer. Motion Hearing held on 10/15/2009. Granting in Part and Denying in Part as stated on the record 35 Order on Motion in Limine. (Court Reporter Janet Coppock)(pabcd)
September 18, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER: Settlement Conference set for 10/9/2009 01:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland. Each party shall submit a confidential settlement statement on or before October 2, 2009. The parties shall file on or before September 28, 2009, revised exhibit lists, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 9/18/09. (bnbcd, )
September 1, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER: re: Granting in part and denying in part 34 MOTION to Modify 10 Scheduling Order filed by Kris P. Johnson. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 9/11/2009. Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/18/2009 08:30 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 9/1/09. (bnbcd, )
May 21, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER denying 27 Motion to Strike Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff's Disclosure and Endorsement of Jerry S. Ogden, M.S., P.E. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37. Expert Discovery is reopened solely to allow the deposition by the plaintiff of Mr. Ogd en. That deposition shall occur, if at all, on or before 7/15/2009. Final Pretrial Conference reset for 9/1/2009 09:00 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 8/25/2009, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 5/21/09. (ebs, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United of Omaha Life Insurance Company v. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Represented By: Franklin D. Patterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kris P. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?