Starr v. Lakewood, City of, The et al
| Adam D. Starr |
| Lakewood, City of, The, Mike (I) Rock, Mike Rock, Ronald (I) Burns, Ronald Burns, John (I) Camper, John Camper, Mark (I) Dietel, Mark Dietel, Daniel (I) McCasky and Daniel McCasky |
| 1:2008cv01390 |
| July 1, 2008 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Jefferson |
| Wiley Y. Daniel |
| Kristen L. Mix |
| Both |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
86
ORDER granting 85 Joint Stipulated Motion to Dismiss this matter WITH PREJUDICE, each party to bear its own attorneys fees and costs. by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 8/4/09.(erv, )
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER granting 82 Motion to Dismiss Parties With Prejudice from this action in their entirety, each party to bear their own attorneys fees and costs. Party John Camper; John (I) Camper; Mark Dietel; Mark (I) Dietel; Daniel McCasky; Daniel (I) McCasky; Ronald Burns and Ronald (I) Burns are Dismissed With Prejudice. by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 7/31/09.(erv, )
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER granting 68 Renewed Motion to Dismiss Party Mike Rock from Plaintiffs Amended Complaint Pursuant to F.R.C.P. Rule 12(b)(6) ; denying 69 Renewed Motion to Dismiss Civil Conspiracy Claim in Amended Complaint Pursuant to F.R.C.P. Rule 12(b)(6) by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 4/27/09.(erv, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
