Citizens for San Luis Valley - Water Protection Coalition v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service et al
| Citizens for San Luis Valley - Water Protection Coalition |
| U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Regional Solicitor, Rocky Mountain Region and U.S. Department of Interior |
| 1:2008cv01439 |
| July 10, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Freedom of Information Act Office |
| Saguache |
| Michael E. Hegarty |
| Edward W. Nottingham |
| None |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 05:552 Freedom of Information Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
ORDER granting 44 Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice, with each parties to pay his or its own attorneys fees and costs. by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 6/5/09.(erv, )
|
|
Filing
43
MINUTE ORDER granting 41 The Joint Motion to Vacate Settlement Conference. The Settlement Conference set for 05/27/2009, is hereby vacated. The parties shall file dismissal papers on or before 06/15/2009 by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 05/26/2009.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
39
MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part 36 Motion to Vacate Contempt Hearing Conditionally Set for May 8, 2009. The contempt hearing conditionally set for Friday, May 8, 2009, at 8:30 a.m. is hereby vacated. by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 5/6/09.(erv, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
