Fernandez v. Bogert et al
Anthony Fernandez |
Thomas (I) Bogert, Thomas Bogert, Denver Police Department and Denver, City and County of |
1:2008cv01475 |
July 14, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Civil Rights: Other Office |
Denver |
Robert E. Blackburn |
Michael J. Watanabe |
Both |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 82 ORDER granting 81 Motion for Leave to Amend Plaintiff's Non-Expert Witness List, As Set For In The Final Pretrial Order 49 . By Judge David L. Russell on 10/22/2009.(sah, ) |
Filing 80 ORDER. The partes are ORDERED to file their proposed jury instructions on or before 10/23/2009. Any proposed voir dire, trial briefs and motions in limine should also be filed on or before 10/23/2009. Responses to any motions in limine must be filed on or before 10/27/2009. By Judge David L. Russell on 10/20/2009. (sah, ) |
Filing 76 ORDER denying 74 Plaintiff's Motion for Recusal. By Judge David L. Russell on 10/06/2009.(sah, ) |
Filing 67 ORDER denying 61 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Order. By Judge David L. Russell on 09/22/2009.(sah, ) |
Filing 62 MINUTE ORDER: Settlement Conference set for 9/16/2009 08:00 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe. Out-of-state parties and counsel will be permitted to attend the settlement conference telephonically;parties and counsel in state shall appear in person, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 9/4/2009. (mjwcd ) |
Filing 60 ORDER denying 54 Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Discovery Responses. By Judge David L. Russell on 08/31/2009.(sah, ) |
Filing 57 ORDER granting in part and denying as moot in part 43 Defendants' Combined Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Brief in Support Thereof. The motion is granted with respect to plaintiff's claims against the City and County of Denver for deliberate indifference, failure to train, and failure to supervise, and those claims are dismissed with prejudice. In all other respects, the motion is denied as moot, by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 8/11/09.(ebs, ) |
Filing 51 MINUTE ORDER granting 44 Defendants' Unopposed (Stipulated) Motion to Amend Scheduling Order to Permit Defendants to Endorce Rebuttal Experts Through June 16, 2009, and Depose Rebuttal Experts Through June 30, 2009, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 07/29/2009.(mjwcd ) |
Filing 42 MINUTE ORDER granting 40 Unopposed (Stipulated) Motion to Amend Scheduling Order to Permit Defendants to Endorse Rebuttal Experts Through 06/02/2009. The defendants are permitted an extension of time to endorse rebuttal experts up through and including 06/02/2009 by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 05/08/2009.(sah, ) |
Filing 39 MINUTE ORDER denying as moot 33 Denying Defendants Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Disclosures of Expert Testimony Pursuant to Rule 26(a)(2) Fed.R.Civ.P. 33 is DENIED as MOOT based upon this courts minute order 38 by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 04/17/2009.(sah, ) |
Filing 38 MINUTE ORDER granting 35 Unopposed (Stipulated) Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. Plaintiffs may properly endorse expert witnesses, as required Fed.R.Civ.P 26(a)(2) and Judge Robert E. Blackburns Trial Preparation Conference Order (Doc.10), on or before 04/15/2009. Defendants may endorse rebuttal experts on or before 05/15/2009. Parties may depose expert witnesses through 06/15/2009 by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 03/20/2009.(sah, ) |
Filing 32 ORDER denying 27 Defendants Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Disclosures of Expert Testimony Pursuant to Rule 26(a)(2) Fed. R. Civ. P.. If the Defendants wish to depose Plaintiffs expert witness, then the parties shall immediately meet and confer and set the deposition of Plaintiffs expert on or before 03/31/2009 which is deadline to complete discovery. Each party shall pay their own attorney fees and costs for this motion by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 03/11/2009.(sah, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.