Mountain States Media, LLC et al v. Adams County, Colorado et al
| Mountain States Media, LLC and Wayne Osterloo |
| Adams County, Colorado and Robert D. Coney |
| 1:2008cv01513 |
| July 17, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Arapahoe |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Marcia S. Krieger |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
86
ORDER granting in full 8 Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 29 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. It is further ORDERED that the trial in this matter, scheduled to commence on July 20, 2009, at 1:30 p.m., is VACATED and al l other pending motions are Denied as Moot; Denying as moot 59 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to file Reply; denying as moot 76 Plaintiff's Motion in Limine; denying Defendants as moot 77 Plaintiff's Motion to Strike ; Denying as moot 78 Plaintiff's Motion in Limine; Denying as moot 79 Plaintiff's Motion in Limine; by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 7/16/09.(erv, )
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER SETTING CASE FOR TRIAL Five Day Jury Trial set for 7/20/2009 01:30 PM in Courtroom A 602 before Judge Christine M. Arguello. Trial Preparation Conference set for 7/13/2009 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom A 602 before Judge Christine M. Arguello. by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 6/25/09. (erv, )
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER granting 68 Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File Supplement In Support of Motion for Summary Judgment by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 4/3/09.(erv, )
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER denying Without Prejudice 66 Motion for Leave to File Supplement, for failure to comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1A. by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 3/13/09.(erv, )
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER granting 63 Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Supplement Responseto Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion to Dismiss. by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 3/4/09.(erv, )
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER DENYING 52 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery Regarding Qualified Immunity Defense; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 51 Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Production of Privilege Log That Meets Requirements of Federal Law by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 2/23/09.(erv, )
|
|
Filing
50
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 02/09/09. (jjh, )
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Reply is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to accept for filing Plaintiffs Reply In Support of Amended Motion [45-2]. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Compel is DENIED as moot, having been sup erseded by the Amended Motion to Compel. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Amended Motion to Compel is GRANTED to require defendant Robert D. Coney to disclose the value of the following: (a) his net worth, (b) real estate holdings owned, and (c) invest ments and business interests owned; and to produce his federal tax returns for tax years 2005, 2006, and 2007. The parties shall prepare a proposed protective order and submit it on or before January 30, 2009, for my review. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the specified financial information shall be disclosed to plaintiffs counsel at the later of (a) February 6, 2009, or (b) entry of the blanket protective order. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 1/27/09.(erv, )
|
|
Filing
42
MINUTE ORDER granting 40 Defendants Unopposed Motion to Amend Scheduling Order re Expert Disclosure Deadline, the defendants shall designate all experts and provide opposing counsel with all information specified in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) on or before February 16, 2009. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 1/21/09.(erv, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
