Martinez v. Arellano et al
| Samuel J. Martinez |
| Michael Arellano and Colorado Attorney General |
| 1:2008cv01589 |
| July 28, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
| Bent |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REOPEN: denying 31 Motion to Reopen Case by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 2/3/11.(msksec, )
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER Denying 28 U.S.C. 2254 Application. The 16 objection to the dismissal of claim three, which the Court has treated as a motion to reconsider, is DENIED. The 4 amended habeas corpus application pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED. Mr . Martinez's request in the 22 letter for the appointment of counsel to represent him is DENIED, as moot. A certificate of appealibility is DENIED, no constitutional infringement having been shown. The Clerk shall close this case, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 07/07/2010. (wjc, )
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER on or before 2/25/2010, the Clerk of the 10th Judicial District Court in Pueblo County, Colorado, shall provide to this Court the original written record of Pueblo County Case No. 04CR729, People v. Samuel J. Martinez. (This order was faxed and sent by regular mail to the Clerk of the 10th Judicial District Court on 1/26/2010 by MEHCD). By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 1/26/2010. (mehcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
