Cooper v. Belcher et al
| Dana Cooper |
| Rhonda Belcher, Bernadette Scott, Dodge and Carol Soares |
| 1:2008cv01599 |
| July 29, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Prison Condition Office |
| Logan |
| Edward W. Nottingham |
| Kathleen M. Tafoya |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
207
ORDER to Cure Deficiency re 204 Notice of Appeal by Dana Cooper, by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 11/16/10. Appellant has 30 days to either pay the filing fee or file a 1915 motion with district court.(bjrsl, )
|
|
Filing
199
ORDER THAT Plaintiff shall file any written objections to the proposed filing restrictions by no later than September 7, 2010; such objections shall not exceed 10 double-spaced pages, written legibly. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT, in the absence of tim ely objections, the above-described filing restrictions shall take effect on September 10, 2010. If Plaintiff does file timely objections, the restriction shall not take effect until the Court rules on the objections. by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 8/25/2010. (erv, )
|
|
Filing
153
MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiffs Motion to Consolidate Defendants Answers & Motion to Dismiss 150 filed 10/19/2009 is DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff seeks a copy of the Motion to Dismiss Amended and Consolidated Complaint 125 , filed 07/17/2009, the Motion is GRANTED IN PART. Plaintiffs Second Motion-for [sic] Court Order-of [sic] Defendants to Serve Defs [sic] Motion to Dismiss 140 is DENIED as moot. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 10/20/2009.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
146
ORDER denying as moot 137 Plaintiffs Motion to Proceed in Two Additional Lawsuits. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 10/05/2009.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
143
ORDER AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED 40 , 63 , 74 , and 136 Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge; denying Plaintiffs Motions for interlocutory injunctive relief 55 , 24 , 35 , 37 , 124 , and 141 . by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 9/18/09.(erv, )
|
|
Filing
136
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: re: Plaintiff's 124 MOTION for Rule 65(b) Interlocutory Injunction by Plaintiff Dana Cooper be DENIED. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 8/24/09. (kmtcd)
|
|
Filing
128
ORDER Granting Service by the United States Marshal re: 113 Amended Consolidated Complaint, filed by Dana Cooper by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 8/4/09. (erv, )
|
|
Filing
118
ORDER OF CLARIFICATION re: 113 Amended Complaint, filed by Dana Cooper The Court ORDERS each properly-served Defendant in the above-captioned lawsuits to respond to Plaintiffs Consolidated Complaint in a manner consistent with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, on or before July 6, 2009. by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 6/17/09. (erv, )
|
|
Filing
112
ORDER DENYING 110 Plaintiff's Objections filed by Dana Cooper. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall submit an amended complaint containing all of his factual allegations and causes of action against all properly named defendants in the above-captioned cases within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 6/3/09. (erv, )
|
|
Filing
108
MINUTE ORDER denying 102 Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 103 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 104 Motion for Preliminary Injunction for failure to confer. by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 6/1/09.(erv, )
|
|
Filing
95
ORDER Denying as moot 79 Motion to Amend Complaint; Denying as moot 27 Motion to Dismiss by Magistrate Judge Kathleen Tafoya on 5/14/09.(erv, ) (Modified on 5/14/2009 corrected to reflect Mag Judge Tafoya) erv, ).
|
|
Filing
94
ORDER that the following actions are consolidated, and future filings in any of the following actions shall be docketed under the above referenced No. 08- cv-01599-CMA-KMT: (1) 08-cv-01599-CMA-KMT; (2) 08-cv-02536-CMA-KMT; (3) 09-cv- 00662-CMA-KMT; ( 4) 09-cv-00667-CMA-KMT; (5) 09-cv-00754-CMA; and (6) 09-cv- 00961-CMA. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Cooper shall file an amended complaint containing all of his factual allegations and causes of action against all proper defendants in the above-listed matters within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 5/13/09. (erv, )
|
|
Filing
74
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 55 MOTION for Order for Interlocutory Injunction filed by Dana Cooper, be DENIED by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 3/24/09. (erv, )
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER 67 Tendered Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint filed by Dana Cooper is STRICKEN; by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 3/16/09. (erv, ) (Modified on 3/17/2009 to show that the Tendered Second Amended Complaint was Stricken)(erv, ).
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 35 MOTION for Motion Interlocutory Injunction 28 2284 filed by Dana Cooper, BE DENIED, and it is ORDERED DENYING Plaintiff's 41 MOTION to Amend Injunction filed by Dana Cooper by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 3/12/09. (erv, )
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Make Monthly Filing Fee Payment or to Show Cause re: 7 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 3/3/09. (erv, )
|
|
Filing
47
MINUTE ORDER granting 44 Motion to Withdraw Documen; withdrawing 43 Motion to Dismiss by Dana Cooper, and the Motion to Withdraw/Dismiss Complaint shall be withdrawn, and stricken from the record. by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 1/6/09.(erv, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
