McCallum v. Boyd Coffee Company
Edward A. McCallum |
Boyd Coffee Company |
1:2008cv01614 |
July 30, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
Douglas |
Richard P. Matsch |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
29:621 Job Discrimination (Age) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 ORDER Granting Stipulated Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice. Each side to pay their own attorneys' fees and costs by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 04/03/09. (jjh, ) |
Filing 10 Stipulated PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 1/8/2009. (rpmcd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: McCallum v. Boyd Coffee Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Edward A. McCallum | |
Represented By: | Charlotte Noelle Sweeney |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Boyd Coffee Company | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.