McCallum v. Boyd Coffee Company
Plaintiff: Edward A. McCallum
Defendant: Boyd Coffee Company
Case Number: 1:2008cv01614
Filed: July 30, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Douglas
Presiding Judge: Richard P. Matsch
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 29:621 Job Discrimination (Age)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 3, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER Granting Stipulated Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice. Each side to pay their own attorneys' fees and costs by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 04/03/09. (jjh, )
January 8, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Stipulated PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 1/8/2009. (rpmcd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McCallum v. Boyd Coffee Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Edward A. McCallum
Represented By: Charlotte Noelle Sweeney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Boyd Coffee Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?