PayoutOne v. Coral Mortgage Bankers
| PayoutOne |
| Coral Mortgage Bankers |
| 1:2008cv01617 |
| July 30, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Contract: Other Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Marcia S. Krieger |
| Michael J. Watanabe |
| Defendant |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
ORDER denying 62 Defendant Coral Mortgage Bankers' Motion to Dismiss Co-Defendant Darren Hayden. This case is remanded to the District Court for Jefferson County, Colorado. Because this Court lacks jurisdiction over this matter, all settings and previous orders are hereby vacated, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 10/22/09.(ebs, )
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER Five-Day Jury Trial set for 6/21/2010 08:00 AM in Courtroom A 701 before Judge Philip A. Brimmer. Trial Preparation Conference set for 6/4/2010 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom A 701 before Judge Philip A. Brimmer, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 7/29/09. (ebs, )
|
|
Filing
57
MINUTE ORDER denying 50 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel and Motion to Stay, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 7/6/09.(ebs, )
|
|
Filing
53
MINUTE ORDER granting 41 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel. Denying 45 Defendant Coral Mortgage Bankers Corp.'s Motion for Protective Order Pursuant to Rule 26(c), by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 6/17/09.(ebs, )
|
|
Filing
39
Minute ORDER granting 34 Defendant Coral Mortgage Bankers Corp.'s Motion for Modification of Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 6/19/2009. Dispositive Motions due by 7/19/2009, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 2/26/09.(gmssl, )
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 20 Coral Mortgage Bankers Amended Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiffs fifth claim for relief in the amended complaint (detrimental reliance) is dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiffs third claim for relief (breach of contract) and fourth claim for relief (promissory estoppel) are not dismissed and remain in force. It is further ORDERED that defendant Coral Mortgage Bankers Motion to Dismiss 18 is DENIED as moot. by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 2/9/09.(erv, )
|
|
Filing
32
MINUTE ORDER granting 28 Plaintiff Payout One and Defendants Darren J. Hayden and Coral Mortgage Bankers Joint Motion to Vacate January 14, 2009 Settlement Conference. The Settlement Conference set on January 14, 2009, at 10:00 a.m., is VACATED. The settlement conference may be reset upon unopposed motion by either/both parties. by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 1/7/09.(erv, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: PayoutOne v. Coral Mortgage Bankers | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: PayoutOne | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey C. Keiffer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Coral Mortgage Bankers | |
| Represented By: | Matthew Ray Groves |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
