Brenna v. Kempthorne
| Sharon Brenna |
| Dirk Kempthorne |
| 1:2008cv01696 |
| August 11, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
| Jefferson |
| Lewis T. Babcock |
| Craig B Shaffer |
| Plaintiff |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
ORDER of Dismissal. Re: 68 Stipulated Motion to Dismiss. Matter is dismissed with prejudice, each party to pay their own fees and costs. Court retains jurisdiction for limited purpose of enforcing terms of settlement agreement, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 4/26/10.(gmssl, )
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER. Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion to Amend Pretrial Order 58 is GRANTED. The parties shall submit proposed voir dire questions on or before 04/21/2010. Plaintiff may file a response to Defendants Trial Brief 61 on or before 04/09/2010, and Defendant may file a reply on or before 04/16/2010. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 04/02/2010.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER As further set forth on the record at the pretrial conference held on March 11, 2010, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: The following witnesses from Defendants may call witness list in the Final Amended Pretrial Order shall be re-characterized a s will call witnesses: William Woody, Special Agent Randolf August, and Colleen Dulin; and On or before March 31, 2010, the parties shall submit (a) one hard copy of proposed jury instructions with annotations, objections, and a corresponding disk; ( b) trial briefs highlighting any evidentiary issues the parties anticipate will arise during the trial; (c) exhibit lists in the proper format reflecting stipulations and specific objections; and (d) any further amendments to the parties witness lists. by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 3/11/2010. (erv, )
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER. Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment 22 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED only with respect to Plaintiffs claim that Defendant retaliated against her by the investigation into her alleged Privacy Act violations in 2007. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 02/17/2010.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER: On or before October 5, 2009, the parties shall file revised exhibit lists modified as discussed at the final pretrial conference, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 9/21/09. (bnbcd, )
|
|
Filing
31
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 9/1/09. (bnbcd, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Brenna v. Kempthorne | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sharon Brenna | |
| Represented By: | Charlotte Noelle Sweeney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Dirk Kempthorne | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
