Arapahoe County Water and Wastewter Public Improvements District et al v. HDR Engineering, Inc.
| Arapahoe County Water and Wastewater Public Improvement District and Arapahoe County Water and Wastewater Authority |
| HDR Engineering, Inc. |
| 1:2008cv01788 |
| August 21, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Contract: Other Office |
| Arapahoe |
| Wiley Y. Daniel |
| Kathleen M. Tafoya |
| Both |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
112
ORDER denying 98 Motion for Attorney Fees by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 10/21/11.(jjh, )
|
|
Filing
107
ORDER denying 104 Motion to Review Clerk's Action Regarding Costs by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 06/16/11.(jjh, )
|
|
Filing
48
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 12/14/09. (kmtcd, )
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER granting 25 MOTION to Amend 2 Complaint by Plaintiff Arapahoe County Water and Wastewater Authority. The Clerk of Court is directed to file the First Amended Complaint, currently attached to the Motion as Doc. No. 25-2 by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 9/25/09.(kmtcd)
|
|
Filing
31
Minute ORDER granting 29 Unopposed MOTION to Vacate and Reschedule the Final Pretrial Conference by Defendant HDR Engineering, Inc. Final Pretrial Conference reset for 11/5/2009 09:15 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 9/3/09.(kmtcd)
|
|
Filing
22
MINUTE ORDER granting 20 Joint Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 8/31/2009. Dispositive Motions due by 9/15/2009. Settlement Conference reset for 9/14/2009 01:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 6/8/09.(gmssl, )
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER Settlement Conference Reset for 6/24/2009 01:30 PM in Courtroom C 201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 3/12/09. (erv, ) (Modified on 3/13/2009 to show the correct courtroom C 201 ) (erv, ).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Arapahoe County Water and Wastewter Public Improvements District et al v. HDR Engineering, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Arapahoe County Water and Wastewater Public Improvement District | |
| Represented By: | Richard L. Harring |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Arapahoe County Water and Wastewater Authority | |
| Represented By: | Richard L. Harring |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: HDR Engineering, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | John Kevin Bridston |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
