Adesta Communications, Inc. v. Utica Mutual Insurance Company
Adesta Communications, Inc. |
Utica Mutual Insurance Company |
1:2008cv01817 |
August 26, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Contract: Recovery/Enforcement Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Edward W. Nottingham |
Michael J. Watanabe |
Defendant |
Federal Question |
28:1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Adesta Communications, Inc. v. Utica Mutual Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Adesta Communications, Inc. | |
Represented By: | David J. Skalka |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Utica Mutual Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | John P. Mullen |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.