Thompson v. McCull et al
Plaintiff: Darryl Edmond Thompson
Defendant: Murl McCull, Richard Lins and Kirt Chavez
Case Number: 1:2008cv02000
Filed: September 17, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Prison Condition Office
County: Crowley
Presiding Judge: Boyd N. Boland
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 20, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER. The Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 51 filed12/11/2009, is APPROVED AND ADOPTED. The defendants Motion for Summary Judgment 47 filed 10/30/2009, is GRANTED. JUDGMENT SHALL ENTER in favor of the defendants, Burl McCullar and Richard Lins, against the plaintiff, Darryl Edmond Thompson. The defendants are AWARDED their costs to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 08/20/2010.(sah, )
September 8, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER. The Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 37 filed 05/12/2009, is APPROVED and ADOPTED as an order of this court. The defendants objections 39 filed 05/26/2009, are OVERRULED. The defendants Motion To Dismiss Pursuant To FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6) 20 filed 02/09/2009, is GRANTED as to the plaintiffs claim for monetary damages, otherwise the motion is DENIED. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 09/08/2009.(sah, )
May 12, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 37 RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATE MAGISTRATE JUDGE. The Court RECOMMENDS that the Defendants Motion to Dismiss 20 be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. I RECOMMEND that Defendants Motion to Dismiss based on 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(e) be granted and that Plaintiffs claim for monetary damages be dismissed, and that Defendants Motion to Dismiss based on Heck v. Humphrey, Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), and qualified immunity be denied by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 05/12/2009. (sah, )
March 11, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER granting 23 Defendants Motion to Stay Pending Resolution of Qualified Immunity. All proceedings in this case are stayed pending a ruling on Defendants Motion to Dismiss 20 filed 02/09/2009 by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 03/11/2009.(sah, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thompson v. McCull et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Darryl Edmond Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Murl McCull
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard Lins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kirt Chavez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?