Craig v. Blanchard
Plaintiff: Teri E. Craig
Defendant: Adam C. Blanchard
Case Number: 1:2008cv02031
Filed: September 19, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Motor Vehicle Office
County: Boulder
Presiding Judge: Kathleen M. Tafoya
Presiding Judge: Michael E. Hegarty
Nature of Suit: Both
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: The Stipulation is granted and the case is dismissed, with prejudice, each party to pay their own costs and attorney fees, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 07/17/09. (wjc, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Craig v. Blanchard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Teri E. Craig
Represented By: John A. Purvis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Adam C. Blanchard
Represented By: Jonathan Scott Robbins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?