Rael v. Costilla County Department of Social Services et al
Plaintiff: Rita Rael
Defendant: Costilla County Department of Social Services, Costilla County Board of County Commissioners, Ramona Archuleta, Edward Vigil, Joe C. Gallegos and Franklin Kuhn
Case Number: 1:2008cv02121
Filed: October 1, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Robert E. Blackburn
Presiding Judge: Kathleen M. Tafoya
Nature of Suit: Both
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Age)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 101 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice 100 is APPROVED. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with the parties to pay their own fees and costs. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 12/14/2009. (sah, )
November 12, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 94 ORDER. Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment and Brief in Support 66 filed 07/29/2009, is DENIED IN PART and DENIED AS MOOT IN PART. At the time judgment is entered, judgment SHALL ENTER on behalf of defendants, Ramona Archuleta and Edward Vigil, and against plaintiff, Rita Rael, as to all claims for relief and causes of action asserted against them. Defendants, Ramona Archuleta and Edward Vigil, are DROPPED as named parties to this action. Plaintiffs Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment 75 filed 09/14/2009, is DENIED. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 11/10/2009.(sah, )
September 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 78 ORDER granting 76 Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion For Voluntary Dismissal of Third Cause of Action (Due Process) Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1) and Status Report Regarding Remaining Claims Pursuant to REB Civ. Practice Standard II.I.1. Plaintiffs third cause of action (Due Process) is DISMISSED. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 09/17/2009.(sah, )
August 18, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 70 ORDER granting 67 the Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion For Voluntary Dismissal of Fourth Cause of Action (Liberty Interest) Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1). Plaintiffs fourth cause of action (Liberty Interest) is DISMISSED.By the close of business on August 28, 2009, the plaintiff shall file with the court a status report in compliance with this courts practice standard, REB Civ. Practice Standard II.I.1.. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 08/18/2009.(sah, )
July 27, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER granting 56 Defendants Unopposed Motion for Clarification. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 07/27/2009.(sah, )
June 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER. The Order To Show Cause 49 entered 06/04/2009 DISCHARGED. Plaintiffs First Claim for Relief is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as against the individual defendants. Plaintiffs Second Claim for Relief is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE asagainst the indi vidual defendants insofar as it asserts claims for retaliation under Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. plaintiffs Third and Fourth Claims for Relief are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as against the individual defendants in their official capacities. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 06/29/2009. (sah, )
June 4, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 17 Motion To Dismiss of Defendants Costilla County Department of Social Services, Edward Vigil, Joe Gallegos and Franklin Kuhn by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 06/04/2009.(sah, )
April 6, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER Re-Setting Settlement Conference for 7/10/2009 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 04/06/09. (wjc, )
March 12, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER. The settlement conference in this matter is hereby re-scheduled for 04/08/2009 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom C-201 by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 03/12/2009. (sah, )
January 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 39 REVISED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 01/29/2009. (sah, )
January 26, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER granting 32 Stipulated Motion For Partial Case Dismissal. Plaintiffs claims against defendant, Costilla County Department of Social Services are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with the parties to pay their own attorney fees and costs. Plaintiffs F irst and Second Claims for Relief ARE DISMISSED with prejudice against defendants, Ramona Archuleta, Edward Vigil, Joe C. Gallegos and Franklin Kuhn, in their individual capacities, with the parties to pay their own attorney fees and costs. defendant, Costilla County Department of Social Services, is DROPPED as a named party to this action, and the case caption is amended accordingly. Signed by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 01/26/2009.(sah, )
January 6, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 24 TRIAL PREPARATION CONFERENCE ORDER: Five (5) Day Jury Trial set for 12/7/2009 08:30 AM in Courtroom A 701 before Judge Robert E. Blackburn. Trial Preparation Conference set for 11/20/2009 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom A 701 before Judge Robert E. Blackburn. Signed by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 01/06/2009. (sah, )
January 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER denying 19 Stipulated Motion for Protective Order. The proposed Protective Order is REFUSED without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 01/05/2009.(sah, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rael v. Costilla County Department of Social Services et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rita Rael
Represented By: Joseph Anthony Salazar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Costilla County Department of Social Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Costilla County Board of County Commissioners
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ramona Archuleta
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Edward Vigil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joe C. Gallegos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Franklin Kuhn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?