Akins v. Mother Lode Properties, LLC et al
| Chelley Akins |
| Mother Lode Properties, LLC, Gold Mine, LLC, Copper Mine LLC and Galena Mine, LLC |
| 1:2008cv02260 |
| October 16, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
| Weld |
| Richard P. Matsch |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 29:2601 Family and Medical Leave Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
ORDER for Dismissal With Prejudice. Each party to pay their own attorney fees and costs by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 07/14/09. (jjh, )
|
|
Filing
8
Minute Entry - Courtroom Minutes for Scheduling Conference held on 4/7/2009 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Unopposed Motion for Filing of Amended Complaint, filed April 6, 2009 7 , is stricken. Defendants' Answer to Amended Complaint, filed February 23, 2008 2 is accepted as fully addressing the Amended Complaint filed February 26, 2009 5 . An order of reference to Magistrate Judge Hegarty will be issued for the limited purpose of conducting settlement. Scheduling Order approved. (Reporter FTR - K. Terasaki.) (rpmcd)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 4/7/2009 at 10:00 AM in Conference Room and proposed order (original only) on paper, shall be submitted directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m. on April 2, 2009. Signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 2/24/2009. (rpmcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
